2020Vision wrote: » So why not list the "improvements" to "things" that you anticipate SF making when they assume power. I'll start you off:- Trains running on time: CHECK.
RocketRaccoon wrote: » Ask yourself this, can it get any worse than it has been? The other 2 have proven they are not fit for purpose so why not give SF a crack at it? If they get it and fail then they are no better then we will know but as it stands they are the best of a bad bunch.
jam_mac_jam wrote: » Yes, I understand the housing crisis thanks. You are calling for an arms race of freebies not increasing the supply or something sensible. Throw more money at it. Which just increased the prices the last time. Making it harder for everyone. Exactly what caused the last crash. Complete lack of economic knowledge and selfishness.
Billcarson wrote: » Well hard to know isn't it as they have never been in power down here!!!! Bet they would not do a ff f*ck up though for starters.
Dwarf.Shortage wrote: » I said nothing about freebies, you're supplementing my quote about an arms race and adding your own assumptions which is completely disingenuous. A penal vacant sites levy, sensible exemptions from the Central Bank borrowing rules, schemes like HTB are all part of the solution. I will happily pay every penny for the home I buy but as it stands it's not possible for me to get out of the rental trap and if professionals making twice the average industrial wage are too poor to buy a two bed apartment we are heading to a deeply worrying place as a country. Patronising my knowledge of economics is also absolutely laughable but I'm not about to get into a dick measuring contest on Boards so I will leave it at noting it's another incorrect assumption you've made.
Water John wrote: » So Spanish Eyes, you'll vote for them any way, enjoy the election.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » If you can point me in the direction of a worthy alternative I am all ears and eyes. I know it sounds like I am a stick in the mud, but I am totally stuck for any other option right now. FG are not great, no question, but as I will not vote for FF/SF/Greens because I saw what FF did to the economy, SF are whingeing Left Wingers, the Greens are well meaning but will tax everything to the hilt to get a cycleway built lol. So what realistically is left for people like me? Genuine question.
Quin_Dub wrote: » Here's the thing - They are all basically incompetent so for me the choice is -Would I rather have a government making a bit of a balls of policies I broadly agree with or would I prefer to have a government making a balls of policies that I absolutely do not agree with? FG have done some things right , they have done quite a few things wrong , but for me they are at least trying to do things that I broadly agree with. FF will make a mess of doing things I do not support - Populist, giveaway crap like the last time they were in Government and SF will do all that and more whilst increasing my taxes to pay for it. Everybody else is a wasted vote as all they'll maybe do is stick their oar in and make an even bigger balls of the plans that who ever is the main party of Government - e.g. Labour in the 1st FG Government protecting the unions and preventing the possibility of root and branch reform of the public sector. So , it's FG for me - Not because I think they've done an outstanding job - far from it , but because they are at least trying to do they right thing but failing quite a bit which, with our piss-poor political class is sadly the best you can hope for.
jam_mac_jam wrote: » Apologies, the economics comment was meant in general not at you. More the last crisis. So sorry if I didn't express that properly. I would actually agree with you on the penal sites levy. An arms race does suggest freebies as you also mentioned the help to buy. So a fair assumption I would argue. I don't have a dick so unable to measure.
darklighter wrote: » This is the reason why FG have a chance of winning.....not because they are any good at governing, they clearly aren't, but because for the silent majority, they are the least worst option Any takers for a change to a benevolent dictatorship?
Dwarf.Shortage wrote: » Or maybe I'm caught in a horrible trap where I can easily afford the mortgage repayments on a house but the cost of renting the exact same house is crippling my ability to put a deposit together. As a single applicant on €70,000 with a €50,000 deposit I could spend €295,000 which wouldn't buy a two bed apartment in Dublin, because of my job I will always have to work in Dublin. I am of the opinion that someone earning double the average industrial wage should be able to afford an apartment. I don't want anything for free, I just want a system that makes it possible for me to pay for it and doesn't leave me stranded renting in perpetuity. But do continue, politics is moving away from valuing the truth you might as well ride the wave.
Dwarf.Shortage wrote: » As a single applicant on €70,000 with a €50,000 deposit I could spend €295,000 which wouldn't buy a two bed apartment in Dublin.
Itssoeasy wrote: » So we are officiallly under starters orders then ? A Saturday election is a new one for us but we will see how it goes turnout wise. It being a Saturday there won't be the evening rush we see and maybe it'll be a steady flow all day. No doubt the parties have been on the radio setting out their stalls so to speak There is one issue that I will turn off from if it's brought up and it's this. Yes, the health service has its problems and they need to be addressed but no doubt we'll have opposition parties talking about fixing the system like there is some magic switch to fix it all. For the majority of my life the health service has had issues to varying degrees but any party claiming their is a simple fix then I'm sorry on that issue you'll have lost my vote.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » I don't really think many change their vote on a whim. Civil War politics is slowly receding following the Confidence and Supply, and fair play to FF for doing it, but they hope for a resurgence for their co-operation. It was needed especially during the Brexit issue and I genuinely salute them for that. But I will never vote for them either. Too easy to open the purse strings and bring us back to crisis I think. Just me. So to me it is going to be either a FF/SF or FG/Indo/Labour government. We shall see I suppose. No harm with a changing of the guard, my situation won't change either way. I'll still be paying taxes to support everyone else. Still be paying LPT on a hard paid for modest house while renters who use the same services don't have to pay it (and some rurals benefit too because they haven't enough loot from their population), will still have to deal with god awful public transport and horrible traffic. And on and on and on. We are a generous nation towards those in need or on benefits/SW. The homeless issue was totally over egged by those who wanted a house for life with little contribution. And the parties that shouted loudest about it. Anyway people like me are totally fed up having to pay for myself and everyone else. We certainly were let down by FG in that regard. We are ignored. Maybe we need an "Early in the Morning and working paying a mortgage, commuting costs Party" lol.
blanch152 wrote: » https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/6-portside-court-east-wall-dublin-3/4396445 Surely something like this - a 2-bed house in a gated development in East Wall for €250k would suit you well?https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/7-clearwater-court-north-royal-canal-park-ashtown-dublin-15-d15-tw73/4405208 This penthouse apartment out the road in Ashtown, a short cycle from the city centre and on a train line would also be available.https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/179-st-margaret-s-road-hampton-wood-finglas-dublin-11/4363581 If you want something bigger, you can get a 4-bed in Finglas.
Billcarson wrote: » Well I admit I'm no die hard sf supporter but I dont expect fg or ff to improve things . They have had a century to try things and imo failed. Time for imo potentially something different. Sf are a risk they have never been in power (down here) but a risk worth taking imo. Dont judge any party till they have been in power,then judge away......
Billcarson wrote: » 100% my line of thought
Nermal wrote: » Yes it would. Perhaps you mean it wouldn’t buy one somewhere you feel meets your standards.
suicide_circus wrote: » the greens need to go for more carrot than stick; massive investment in public transport and big grants for home insulation and electric vehicles and i'd throw them a number 1.
