Ash.J.Williams wrote: » if it was me in the video getting boxed i'd sue again ...has to be libelous
Alf Veedersane wrote: » I'm not sure what basis you'd sue on but it wouldn't be libel anyway. But if he didn't sue TMZ when they released it, he probably won't be suing the UFC.
Effects wrote: » It probably a different use with UFC than TMZ. TMZ can probably claim it to be news. UFC are using it in a commercial way, so I'd say the guy would be entitled to a usage fee for using his image. He's be silly not to follow it up though. Easy money.
hots wrote: » I'd love to see Forrest do more of this.
HattrickNZ wrote: » Maybe humans in general are all fallable and the bigger you are the bigger the fall.
rob316 wrote: » 80m? Not a hope he's full of it
hewhoscares wrote: » Yeah in court documents with the ?hunt? case or may have been anti-trust case. But even Mendes and Aldo fight the estimated pay days weren't near what we thought. Like 3-4 mill when estimates with PPV where much higher
rob316 wrote: » If it does 2m in ppv buys that's about $120m. It probably won't do close to that though, no way he sees $80m from it.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I never thought Danis was of much use (in the corner) anyway. He's clearly an exceptional BJJ player but his cageside advice is sub par.