Ted_YNWA wrote: » Mod Did you ask them about their circumstances? This is not the place to have a go at anyone, even more so people who need to avail of food banks. Have some respect and empathy.
sbsquarepants wrote: » That's a piss poor comparison. Every person on this planet eats - we have all been exposed to food our whole lives. We're not talking about splitting atoms here - peel a spud, throw it in a pot. Don't make excuses for stupidity and laziness!
oceanman wrote: » I work beside one of these foodbanks and they do great work, all run by volunteers. many people depend on them.
Feisar wrote: » Respect is earned and faux empathy is part of the reason these people are in the position they are in. Social welfare is paid to keep people sedated.
Edgware wrote: » Especially the fat *****
wiggle16 wrote: » Should they have to live off their accumulated blubber until they're thin enough to merit feeding, like a walrus?
partyguinness wrote: » OP, You should hang around outside the District Court on any given day- you should see the fat lazy skangers waiting around for their criminal case. Family day out.
Chalk McHugh wrote: » Interesting. I happened to be in Smithfield about 6 months ago and was walking past Brother Crowleys Cappuchin monks place where he feeds hundreds (maybe thousands) of people twice daily. I was with my mother and we couldn't believe the amount of people pulling up around the corner in nice cars and vans and the passenger (nearly always a woman) heading in and coming out with a big food parcel. Seemed to be a lot of travellers and Roma gypsies. I know a Philipino social worker who told me personally that she had to leave working there for her own mind as the amount of people who were not obviously poor or hungry and were just using the place and taking advantage of Bro Crowleys and the staffs great work made her so disillusioned she decided to leave. Slightly off topic apologies but another example of the 'what can you get for nothing, self entitled' generation of wasters taking the piss bigtime and nobody saying anythingabout it.
LirW wrote: » If people grew up in a household with an unhealthy diet, the chance is very high they won't ever change it. If in your formative first few years of life people are fed unhealthily and their whole environment doesn't value a balanced diet, this can screw kids for life. Bad habits are formed, the taste buds are underdeveloped, often no routine is established and no introduction to different textures happened. A narrow diet is an uphill battle even if you want to get out of it. So many unconscious associations happen that there can be a genuine disgust.
rdwight wrote: » Let's leave the legal profession out of this
spurious wrote: » I was once asked (by a person with a Science degree) whether I peeled potatoes before cooking them for mash. Some people have never seen/watched anyone cook.
oceanman wrote: » mind you don't fall off that high horse.....the ground might be closer than you think..
the beer revolu wrote: » That's a completely reasonable question to ask. When I worked as veg/starter chef in a high end restaurant, many moons ago, we had to boil the potatoes unpeeled, peel them while still hot and put them through a ricer, beat them with cream, butter and egg yolk and then pipe them, still while hot.
MrAbyss wrote: » For some reason doing deliveries in the last month I have stumbled upon food banks and free kitchens around the country. I would say a good 80% of the 'starving' are obese people.
MrAbyss wrote: » For some reason doing deliveries in the last month I have stumbled upon food banks and free kitchens around the country. I would say a good 80% of the 'starving' are obese people. You hardly see anyone who looks malnourished. Lots of chain-smoking and sports clothes with named labels on them. I think for the vast majority of the 'clients' they are just parasites who want something else for free that's going and if they have no money for food it is because the spend it all on booze, fags and iPhones. Not to put down the folks who work in these places, but it's just another freebee for the knuckle-scrapers from what I can tell. It seems to be more of a sense of further entitlement with many, than genuine want.
CoBo55 wrote: » 7/10, you lost points for failing to mention feral kids, giant TV's and free council house.
riclad wrote: » Most homeless people do not have a cooker, or an oven, people staying in a hostel or a hotel, may have a kettle to make tea or coffee .
MrAbyss wrote: » These are not homeless people I am talking about. They are living in council houses with cookers and everything they need paid for. The homeless is a whole other issue so don't be spreading the goalposts of platitudes further apart to take the focus off the parasite skangers on the grift.
sbsquarepants wrote: » Processed food is hugely more expensive than buying fresh vegetables.
Obvious Desperate Breakfasts wrote: » As a keen home cook, I don’t know. Yeah you take each component part of a recipe and it won’t be too expensive. Add it all up and the processed thing is probably just as cheap or maybe cheaper.
CrankyHaus wrote: » This does raise the question as to whether some sort of free home cooking and basic home economics classes would be a better investment than a load of duplicated charity soup kitchens and food banks.