Kermit.de.frog wrote: » 800 years!!!!!!!!!! 800 no less.
saabsaab wrote: » I don't believe you are being fair, nobody was saying that, just wanted to remember Irishmen on the wrong side of history. You'd swear some thought they wanted to make God save the King the national anthem!
bubblypop wrote: » Just the attitude that means we will never be a united country.
Larbre34 wrote: » Certainly, but how much resistance and legitimate criticism do you want to arm them with?
KWAG2019 wrote: » This has revealed the people here, in media, in academia and politics with a real problem with the fact that we fought for and won our independence. The amount of internalized colonialism is astonishing to see. Spurious and irrelevant points are made and repeated ad nauseam. The people are denigrated, mocked, sneered at by supposedly superior intellects. The self styled intellectual elite of the RIC commemorations have shown how they regard this country and our freedom. Many of these are unionists and do not recognize it.
hatrickpatrick wrote: » I'm a young person who was devastated and appalled when I heard about this. I can't even imagine what it must be like for someone who lived through The Troubles and saw what the crown forces were willing to do in order to maintain the oppression of Irish people, or even had parents or aunts or uncles who were directly brutalised by the scumbags that were the RIC during the War of Independence.
The Rape of Lucretia wrote: » The RIC were the state and legitimate. They cannot be relabled post hoc.
Deleted User wrote: » Spin another record.
KWAG2019 wrote: » As a senior citizen I am crying tears of relief that this dishonour to our country and our patriot dead has been stopped. So many ordinary people have been abused by those who say we have no historical nuance, no maturity, are exclusionary that that in itself is a separate affront.
Cody montana wrote: » Probably will still win though.
The Rape of Lucretia wrote: » Those killed in the rising were the enemies of the state of the time. The RIC were the state and legitimate.
Fann Linn wrote: » So moving forward with your logic, you want to commemorate a force that indulged in state sponsored terrorism.
ygolometsipe wrote: » This will go down in history as the biggest self sabotage by a political party right before an election. The memes are great!!! never liked this Fine Gael government TBH...
The Rape of Lucretia wrote: » Those killed in the rising were the enemies of the state of the time. The RIC were the state and legitimate. They cannot be relabled post hoc. Had the British subsequently invaded the south and reneged on The Treaty, then they would indeed have been emenies of the Free State. But before that, they werent. That it will now be left to voluntary supporters to mount this deferred commemoration is reminder, of a magnitude that we have not seen for decades, of how backward, of how poorly, and immaturely, much of southern Ireland has come to term with its past.
FrancieBrady wrote: » The state doesn't hold commemorations for the IRA or Sinn Fein either as far as I know.
FrancieBrady wrote: » We managed to hold inclusive and respectful commemoration for all those killed in the Rising in 2016 (albeit after this same government where forced to withdraw an insulting video and had their cards marked). There is mutual respect, what there isn't is a tolerance for whitewashing and rehabilitating enemies of this state whether they be British or Irish.
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » Didn't the IRA and Sinn Féin not recognise the state until recently? They didn't really care about the state that was formed much back then.
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » Huh? The PIRA killed over 400 Irish Catholics during the troubles. Why should they be commemorated? The RIC shouldnt and neither should the PIRA by Sinn Féin.
ReginaldSmythV wrote: » No it doesn’t. This is Ireland. Commemorate whoever you want in the UK.
Galwayguy35 wrote: » So we should commerate traitors and murderers just to keep Lizzie Winsdors fan club happy? No thanks.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Nobody is stopping the family members of the RIC/DMP or even the B&T's from commemorating their family members. Why would you represent it as that? It had nothing to do with families of the deceased. It was about the integrity of a state commemorating organisations that tried to prevent that state from existing.