Upcoming Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) Movies Use Spoiler Tags

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxsysYzcdN4

Peyton Reed has signed on to direct Ant Man 3 for an expected release dated of 2022

EoinMcLovin

Bucky and Falcon
Image-from-iOS.jpg?fit=bounds&width=640&height=480

Zemo

Image-from-iOS-3.jpg?fit=bounds&width=640&height=480

Sharon Carter
Image-from-iOS-4.jpg?fit=bounds&width=640&height=480

US Agent

Image-from-iOS-5.jpg?fit=bounds&width=640&height=480

Marvels What if

EoinMcLovin

https://twitter.com/MCU_Direct/status/1196250409477853184?s=20

Very 60's The Avengers feel to that.

Is she going to be Mrs Peel to his Steed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O76fSEGW8J8

Agent Coulson wrote: »

Very 60's The Avengers feel to that.

Is she going to be Mrs Peel to his Steed

Ew no!

If it's anything like the Fraction run she's a kid who nicks his gimmick, but they get on, and she turns out to be far more responsible than the adult Hawkguy ever was.

Anyway that's all irrelevent PIZZA DOG.

EoinMcLovin

Looking very Bourney, as a BW movie should.

Penn

Doctor DooM wrote: »

Looking very Bourney, as a BW movie should.

Went a bit "superhero landing"-y at the end though. Dropping from a height and landing on the walkway, maneuvering herself through falling debris while falling from the sky. That started to feel a bit OTT for both what her skillset is supposed to be and how we've seen her in the past.

Loughc

This is going to be the first Marvel movie I skip i think, I just see no point in prequels. There's no stakes in prequels, we know exactly where the character ultimately ends up. It's a waste of a movie IMO.

Penn wrote: »

Went a bit "superhero landing"-y at the end though. Dropping from a height and landing on the walkway, maneuvering herself through falling debris while falling from the sky. That started to feel a bit OTT for both what her skillset is supposed to be and how we've seen her in the past.

All the elements I disliked in the trailer were the superhero ones. I know we have to have Red Guardian because

he's Nat's long lost husband

but I think I'd be good with this just being a tense thriller.

Loughc wrote: »

This is going to be the first Marvel movie I skip i think, I just see no point in prequels. There's no stakes in prequels, we know exactly where the character ultimately ends up. It's a waste of a movie IMO.

Trying not to be spoilery, if you don't know your Marble comics, but this film is clearly an origin story for another character.

Loughc wrote: »

This is going to be the first Marvel movie I skip i think, I just see no point in prequels. There's no stakes in prequels, we know exactly where the character ultimately ends up. It's a waste of a movie IMO.

I think I’m burnt out now of Superhero everything.

Same with Star Wars I would have been first line for both and now I cant even be bothered going to see the rise of Skywalker in the cinema and I’ll be the same with Black Widow.

FunLover18

Doctor DooM wrote: »

All the elements I disliked in the trailer were the superhero ones. I know we have to have Red Guardian because
he's Nat's long lost husband
but I think I'd be good with this just being a tense thriller.

Looks like they're setting up a different dynamic in the trailer or am I misreading.

Foxtrol

Have the same feeling towards this as I did for Solo, it isn't really something I feel is needed.

It could still do reasonably well given the big gulf in Marvel content before it.

Cotts72

Has this been confirmed as a prequel of sorts before endgame

Lithium93_

Cotts72 wrote: »

Has this been confirmed as a prequel of sorts before endgame

It's set after the events of Civil War, but before Infinity War.

Looks good.

Doctor DooM wrote: »

Looking very Bourney, as a BW movie should.

Feels bit bit different from the first Bourne.

Lithium93_ wrote: »

It's set after the events of Civil War, but before Infinity War.

Looks like there'll be flashbacks, maybe they'll do a chunk of story in the past.

Cotts72

I'm still stumped as to the point of this movie due to how endgame played out. I'll 100% go to see it but I'd expect some after credits scene going forward with some form of repercussion from this movie

Well it might not have been obvious in endgame but that film opened up a world of hurt in terms of

travelling in time and to paralell timelines and maybe paralell universes (though the universe is just a guess on this one). So anyway, yeah, stuff happening to Nat in the distant past could well have been done by the now endgame past and affect the future to come.

Cotts72 wrote: »

I'm still stumped as to the point of this movie due to how endgame played out. I'll 100% go to see it but I'd expect some after credits scene going forward with some form of repercussion from this movie

This is 100% a set up movie for something.

To say more is to spoil stuff from the comics.

kerplun k

I see loeb / Perlmutters TV division is now officially dead. Apart from the upcoming Hulu animation and Helstrom, nothing more will come from Marvel TV. Feige has complete control now.

I guess going forward any new "TV shows" will be tethered directly to the MCU. No more Punisher, Legion and the likes, but on the other hand, anything produced will now be held to a higher standard with massive budgets.

kerplun k

I feel a bit sorry for Loeb. he's done a half decent job. Bringing stuff like the defender shows, Legion and AoS to our screens. Sure there's been a few misfires like Inhumans, but overall the quality of what he's produced hasn't been too bad.

Foxtrol

kerplun k wrote: »

I feel a bit sorry for Loeb. he's done a half decent job. Bringing stuff like the defender shows, Legion and AoS to our screens. Sure there's been a few misfires like Inhumans, but overall the quality of what he's produced hasn't been too bad.

Agreed, it wasn't as if he was given the new Disney+ content that will be much more tied into the MCU.

Need an Agent Carter series in the swinging 60's now however I don't see Disney+ making that one.

Foxtrol

Agent Coulson wrote: »

Need an Agent Carter series in the swinging 60's now however I don't see Disney+ making that one.

With Steve hiding in her basement?

Foxtrol wrote: »

With Steve hiding in her basement?

In a Disney+ show?? :eek:

Loeb's case is one that always makes me feel weird.

I haven't been a fan of his for a few years, starting when he cancelled the excellent "Earth's Mightiest Heroes". He's made a lot of choices that just don't feel right. But he also has a huge body of excellent work, and despite what people say some of it does come after his personal tragedy. Runaways is great, and I think most people would agree Jessica Jones/ Daredevil season 1 are really good too. A lot of people don't like Hush but he's a new character that's stuck for Batman. I have a very muted response to the folding of Marvel TV into the cinema division.

Did Feige make Wolverine and the X-Men under Loeb? Funny how things turn out.

Christian Bale might be in Thor: Love and Thunder!

Christian Bale May Be Heading to the Marvel Cinematic Universe
https://io9.gizmodo.com/christian-bale-may-be-heading-to-the-marvel-cinematic-u-1840836813

There’s no word on which role Bale would play

The White Wolf

Probably not anyone significant in the grand scheme of things and a one off appearance.

Would love to see Bale take on Doom but couldn't see him taking on the committment.