Eod100 wrote: » When is he IQ again, next March? Probably be too late for 6N but be interesting to see if he is in squad for summer series.
Interested Observer wrote: » November 2020 he's eligible.
bilston wrote: » Kleyn getting the nod ahead of Toner was a farce. I'm neither Leinster nor Munster so have no dog in the fight from a provincial perspective.
Deleted User wrote: » There is a part of me that want's to label it not just as a farce, but as an utter disgrace given the commitment Toner gave to Ireland over a long period of time. I was plenty salty about it but gave the benefit of the doubt as I expect that Joe schmidt interprets data better than I do. I actually thought the bigger call was Marmion but Toner was a close second. I don't think it's fai to call time on Klyne's international career nor on his commitment to Ireland based on a period of time when the Irish team manufactured a loss to Japan. I abandoned all expectation after that game as it exemplified a loss of form from which we were unlikely to recover from. I still believe that Joe is the best coach in world rugby. If he returns to the game I'd almost rather it was with with a province as I'd fear a coach of his calibre unleashed by the absence of public expectation which overshadowed his final year with Ireland. And yet at the same time I'd wish him the best as he did a huge amount for Irish rugby on the field and an award worthy amount for Ireland off it. A quality human being who I have huge admiration for.
[Deleted User] wrote: » There is a part of me that want's to label it not just as a farce, but as an utter disgrace given the commitment Toner gave to Ireland over a long period of time. I was plenty salty about it but gave the benefit of the doubt as I expect that Joe schmidt interprets data better than I do. I actually thought the bigger call was Marmion but Toner was a close second. I don't think it's fair to call time on Klyne's international career nor on his commitment to Ireland based on a period of time when the Irish team manufactured a loss to Japan. I abandoned all expectation after that game as it exemplified a loss of form from which we were unlikely to recover from. I still believe that Joe is the best coach in world rugby. If he returns to the game I'd almost rather it was with with a province as I'd fear a coach of his calibre unleashed by the absence of public expectation which overshadowed his final year with Ireland. And yet at the same time I'd wish him the best as he did a huge amount for Irish rugby on the field and an award worthy amount for Ireland off it. A quality human being who I have huge admiration for.
Interested Observer wrote: » It pretty clearly was on, just needed to make a better pass.
Interested Observer wrote: » Yeah he's talked about it alright.
Burkie1203 wrote: » Lot of respect for Joe 2019 most definitely will define his time as Ireland coach Best coach in the world is Warren Gatland.
Dubinusa wrote: » He's not close to being the best coach! The last year proved it. He failed to see or alter what was in front of him! Anyone could see our performance was atrocious and easily read. He did have a great record as our coach! The blemish was this past year, which was awful! A coach who can't see or change what's in front of him, is certainly lacking imo! The past year in reality was a shocking loss of cohesion, tactics and coaching! The burden lays with Schmidt!
thebaz wrote: » I'm sure he grew up dreaming of playing for Ireland ???? He is an excellent rugby player , but I thought he saw himself more as a Kiwi than Irish ???
Interested Observer wrote: » None of this has the slightest bit of relevance as to whether he'll play for Ireland or not.
Deleted User wrote: » There is a part of me that want's to label it not just as a farce, but as an utter disgrace given the commitment Toner gave to Ireland over a long period of time. I was plenty salty about it but gave the benefit of the doubt as I expect that Joe schmidt interprets data better than I do. I actually thought the bigger call was Marmion but Toner was a close second. I don't think it's fair to call time on Klyne's international career nor on his commitment to Ireland based on a period of time when the Irish team manufactured a loss to Japan. I abandoned all expectation after that game as it exemplified a loss of form from which we were unlikely to recover from. I still believe that Joe is the best coach in world rugby. If he returns to the game I'd almost rather it was with with a province as I'd fear a coach of his calibre unleashed by the absence of public expectation which overshadowed his final year with Ireland. And yet at the same time I'd wish him the best as he did a huge amount for Irish rugby on the field and an award worthy amount for Ireland off it. A quality human being who I have huge admiration for.
thebaz wrote: » you were the one who stated he wanted to play for Ireland - I questioned this - he is a great player for Leinster , but surly he should play for NZ , if he is good eneogh
Interested Observer wrote: » https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sportsjoe.ie/amp/rugby/james-lowe-ireland-rugby-205999
"Obviously," he adds, "with the contract it was like, 'We want you, in three years' time, to play for Ireland'. That was kind of the reasoning why I was offered [what I was] for someone in my position, who hadn't been an All Black yet.
hahashake wrote: » Dirty business.:p
Interested Observer wrote: » Yes it is, I don't like 'buying' players for the national team at all but it's the situation we're in.
thebaz wrote: » There you said it - buying players - I just feal for someone like Andrew Conway who actually dreamed of playing for Ireland, unlike Lowe who dreamed of playing for NZ , and will have less chance of doing so cause of this buying players policy in rugby.
Granny15 wrote: » Why not NZ have built their success on it bringing in islanders etc.
Interested Observer wrote: » This is old ground really. Stander, Kleyn, Payne, etc.
bilston wrote: » Yep, Strauss as well, still It might be old ground but it doesn't make it right. That said once Lowe makes his debut and plays well, people will soon forget. I don't think of Stander, Payne and Aki as anything other Irish rugby players (or a coach in the case of Payne) now, but before they started playing it didn't sit well with me.
Eod100 wrote: » Well it's particularly old ground because rules have already changed and Lowe will be one of last players to qualify by 3 year rule.
bilston wrote: » I know the rules have changed but Lowe is still benefitting from the old rules so it remains a valid discussion whether it is old ground or not. Ultimately it's all irrelevant, Robert Balacoune will soon take Lowe's place anyway
stephen_n wrote: » Surely they’re all just placeholders for Sexton.