Wanderer78 wrote: » Oh ffs folks, would yea just get some hobbies, if you don't like her or what she has to say, just move on, it's an unhealthy obsession for some at this stage
Dakota Dan wrote: Since when is criticism an obsession?
Dick_Swiveller wrote: » People follow whatever the media and, in particular, social media tells them to follow. There is a real herd like mentality among the devotees of this teenager. ard.
Wanderer78 wrote: » Ah come on now, there's critics that are completely obsessed about this girl, just move on lads, it's very unhealthy for you everyday, just let it go
Dakota Dan wrote: You could say the same about her worshipers? Why does it bother you so much that people criticise her? You just need to take a leaf out of your own book and move on.
Harika wrote: » You might ask yourself if your desire to fight Greta origins in social media too.
Dick_Swiveller wrote: » So, the vast majority of people who didn't give 2 fcuks about climate change until a few months ago are now fully on board because a scientifically illiterate teenager, cosseted and promoted by the mainstream media, and, thanks to her parents and various dodgy people, running a slick PR operation - has told them that the world is going to end soon. Grown adults are now true believers because twatter and twatbook have told them that Greta is the saviour of the world. This is why the West is in decline.
Professor Moriarty wrote: » Always a giveaway.
Harika wrote: » It's one thing not to support her, another thing is to post memes about her, limelight, throw red herrings, claim without proof and so on. On the other hand the more you and the other media rub itself on her the longer she will stay relevant.
Dick_Swiveller wrote: » Nah, this mass hysteria nonsense needs to be challenged.
Wanderer78 wrote: » Say wha? I've no need to be moving anywhere, it's all good here
Millicently wrote: » That's actually a disgusting comment that speaks volumes about your character. Most people don't think about ''rubbing'' themselves on a child.
20Cent wrote: » People still making the "Greta uses the things and exists so is a hypocrite for expressing an opinion" point, that got old after page three of this thread.
Millicently wrote: » It won't be though, at least not for a while. How many trees were felled to provide paper for Greta's book which was perfectly timed for the Christmas market? Oh, I'm sure they'll say it was all sustainable woodland etc, then again the media isn't going to check. Just like they didn't ask why when she is concerned about the environmental impact of fossil fuels and flying, did she travel onboard the yacht of a man who has made his fortune in mining and oil rigs?
friendlyfun wrote: » It would be close to impossible for someone in a western industrialised country to live in a way that does not negatively affect the environment in one way. That's why Greta has least shown improvements can be made. She's been called a member of ISIS, a lackey of George Soros, a puppet, and there's a lot of bs and and propaganda out of there trying to discredit her. Trying to accuse her of being hypocrisy is also bollocks.
hetuzozaho wrote: » It got so old they had to create new accounts to post it
Gaoth Laidir wrote: » Who is that curly bint?
Dakota Dan wrote: » Could be either her mother or one of her handlers.
splinter65 wrote: » What’s disgusting now? It’s 11.20am on a Saturday and you’re outraged at something you’ve clearly decided is just not on. That’s speaks about you though.
Pa ElGrande wrote: » She is an executive director at a $400 million per annum corporation that specialises in creating moral outrage among the public in order to fund its business model.
Millicently wrote: » There's some young woman who is always sat beside her at public events who is from Bono's youth foundation.
