wirelessdude01 wrote: » Gallagher didn't get it. No surprised really as to be honest he is not considered in the best light by a lot of North Mayo GAA people despite what he would like you to think.
irishgeo wrote: » The pro was only taking orders you would guess but the donkey commet is a bit worrying.
Banner2theend wrote: » https://twitter.com/newportmayo1951/status/1206256762782994434
RedDevil55 wrote: » Does that mean he's dropping the lawsuit?
RedDevil55 wrote: » It was the treasurer Kevin O'Toole that sent the donkey email. Cunnane was responsible for the music choice at the underdogs game. In fairness to Cunnane, he's done a good job over the last few years apart from that. Setting up mayo gaa tv for one thing. There's no way of knowing if Gallagher would do any better.
PressRun wrote: » Liam Moffatt was O'Leary's pick for chairman, btw. He supposedly approached a few clubs. Make of that what you will. I think he has somewhat enjoyed the attention that this controversy has brought on him. He has every right to know how his money is being managed and spent and the county board absolutely needed to be brought to heel and held accountable, even if that meant public embarrassmet. Whether it's right for a donor to be attempting to influence clubs to make moves in his favour is another matter. Regardless, I think Moffatt should be fine and his good relationship with the senior management should be a positive. Wouldn't be surprised at all if he had a hand in Ciaran McDonald's decision to join the senior set up. The county board absolutely needed a clear out and several faces needed to step away. Not surprised the Michael Gallagher didn't get the PRO job, but I would have reservations about Cunnane. Rumours about him being the leak to the Connacht Telegraph.
seligehgit wrote: » Totally agree if it is true he attempted to influence clubs as suggested. TBF irrespective of same it appears there was undoubtedly a groundswell of support for change within the executive amongst the grassroots of Mayo GAA. Which leak do you speak of PressRun?
flasher0030 wrote: » Hard to know what to make of all of this. But it’s difficult to argue against the point that the final outcome is welcome. I know some of the county board members, and there are self-important egos there. Unfortunately for them, this Tim dude seems to have as big of an ego, and in a stubborn way. He wasn’t going to lie down. I haven’t spoken to Liam Moffatt for many a year, but from what I remember he is a very genuine chap, and has a real passion for football. I think he will steer away from the cloak and dagger rubbish, and will take things forward in a position manner. He has been involved in the backroom staff of the county management previously, so he has a tie in there. And he’s from the same club as Ciaran Mac, and same age, so may have been an influence in get the Mac into the fold. Anyway, whilst the publicity is not good for the county, I think the county board setup is in a better place now. In any case, it’s not the county board that will be taking to the pitches from January through to September (hopefully). So it is a bit of a side-show.
White lighting wrote: » Not from Mayo but O'Leary comes across as an awful clown. I am sure there were many mishandled funds by the county board but he is getting too big for his boots and seems awful self centered. Anyway his little show the last few months i dont think will do Mayo much good in the long run
ProudDUB wrote: » Putting his foot in it again by taking a pop at Newstalk. How dare they have the temerity to question the wisdom of the recent media ban. Is he still only taking orders? Lord above !
wirelessdude01 wrote: » Sure I even remember at the time that Aido retweeted that video. It was very tongue in cheek.
RedDevil55 wrote: » Mayo players break silence on recent events...https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/sport/gaa/odonoghue-says-ruane-focus-is-with-mayo-971085.html
Call me Al wrote: » Recent events? He talks about Matthew Ruane for a bit, mentions McDonald, and very diplomatically declines the question about "recent events".
RedDevil55 wrote: » It was a tongue in cheek comment. Apologies, I thought that was obvious.