Tell me how wrote: » Oh. My. God. This.... this changes everything. I mean, what was she thinking. I feel so let down, and lied to and Oh, my God, I can't even........... Not! A - Is she expected to survive on thin air? B - She is just off a boat, do people think that she has full equipment to cook and store food with her? C - Do you really think that this undermines her message? D - Is it actually her car (or the car she travelled in)? I know the video maker went out looking for a scoop to undermine her, I wouldn't be surprised if we found out that she hadn't been anywhere near the car.
Tell me how wrote: » What about the way this poster used it? We are way down the rabbit hole when posters who spend a lot of their time talking about snowflake liberals are now perplexed by it being suggested they appear triggered.
Deleted User wrote: » more than that. being triggered is a serious PTSD response reaction when something sends you back into that distress state to use it as the mocking, contemptuous slap in the manner weve seen throughout this thread demonstrates either enormous ignorance, appalling lack of empathy or offensive callousness but its ok, because they are the good guys transparent as **** imo, as is the rest of their nasty behaviour to anyone asking the wrong questions
Deleted User wrote: » reported this post for triggering content
DublinWriter wrote: » I just don't understand why people are obsessing on the messenger, rather than the message.
weldoninhio wrote: » The attached sums Greta up. Spoilt little rich kid.,
weldoninhio wrote: » Can you explain “triggers”? I’ve seen it throughout the thread. Triggered this, triggers that. Can’t people hold a differing opinion without being triggered? Is saying triggered just a succinct way of saying holds a different opinion to me??
Fr_Dougal wrote: » Her childhood. We stolded it.
DublinWriter wrote: » I just don't understand why people are obsessing on the messenger, rather than the message. If she triggers you personally, then you need to go for a long walk and have a chat with yourself.
Micky 32 wrote: » I couldn’t be arsed to read over the sh*te again. Some say she has autism and you and others say aspergers. Would you like me to edit my posts to suit you? I don’t know much about the girl as i have said in a previous post. Oh seeing we are getting a lesson on reading posts i do remember you not reading my posts very well and me having to correct you. Before replying please read the post properly before replying, thank you.
Hector Savage wrote: » I saw her in Madrid last week, asked a question should these young people change their OWN lives and habits . She brushed it aside and basically said - Protest more, bring more awareness. This cult has nothing to do with actual change, they just want anarchy, they want idiots supergluing themselves to the road - which only alienates people. She had the chance to tell her supporters to walk more, use electronics less, stop changing your phone ever x months .... but no, let the social media likes campaign continue .....
Hunky Monster wrote: » Ah fake news I get you.
Micky 32 wrote: » Oh dear :-/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=r8SyoRwV_To&feature=youtu.be
Micky 32 wrote: » With all them beans she’ll produce more greenhouse gasses than cows!
Hunky Monster wrote: » Where does Greta think the batteries come from in her Tesla?
Hunky Monster wrote: » Where does Greta think the batteries come from in her Tesla? And who eats canned beans in their car. Disgusting.
Tell me how wrote: » Brilliant. Gozunda doesn't agree so can decree how something is viewed on thread.Get over yourself man. You can add all the 'lol's' and 'it's funny how' or 'funny old worlds' you want, you've gone right across the board in your arguments against Greta, it's definitely fueled by something and hatred seems the most likely. Now, the root cause for that hatred is more intriguing...
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » On the "person of the year" award... What is she risking, what is she sacrificing? Meanwhile, for example,...what are the protestors in Hong Kong risking? On any level it's absurd.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » On the "person of the year" award...What is she risking, what is she sacrificing? Meanwhile, for example,...what are the protestors in Hong Kong risking? On any level it's absurd.
Person of the Year (called Man of the Year or Woman of the Year until 1999) is an annual issue of the United States news magazine Time that features and profiles a person, a group, an idea, or an object that "for better or for worse... has done the most to influence the events of the year"
Deleted User wrote: » you.... .. you can tell the difference between a poster not particularly subscribing to the purported beliefs of a public figure... ...and that poster doing something worthy of you attacking them in this thread? you can do that, cant you?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/b1a8522b26abe4367117071263a70671.svg)
