nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Women snaring a man before they lose their looks/vibrancy?

bo0li5eumx12kp

Oh yes.

Oh you'd love it.

Many a woman has tried to snare me.

Many a woman has failed.

...

I can't get down like that.

I'm a SLUT man.
I dig short skirts, high heels, heavy on the makeup, light on the clothing.

When a chick reaches "that point" and starts going into bride-mode, the understanding seems to be they have to ration the sex, keep their man under control - so all that promiscuous nastiness goes out the window.

AmIRite?

What I don't get in so many circumstances is - I mean, I know marriage is a home run for so many men;

It's an improvement from their bachelor lifestyles of social reclusion and fervent lonely masturbation; now they have a partner, a real person to make coitus with on a relatively frequent basis (I understand the norm after 5 years is like, a semi-annual subscription?).

But what I don't get is how some man can basically accept a chick that used to throw it about like pass-the-parcel to alpha-frat-boys, and now holds out and doesn't do a fraction of the nasty kinky hijinx she got up to in her youth, with them?

I couldn't live like that.

I would sooner tie a mill-stone about my neck, and go old testament on ya'll.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Hercule Poirot

Think it's nearly time for your bed isn't it? What with school tomorrow and all that...

BDI

You could always tie a ball to a bat and hold it in one hand, then furiously masterbate in the other hand while your hair slowly falls out and the bags under your eyes get bigger.

Timberrrrrrrr

Aaron Jolly Farmyard wrote: »

Oh yes.

Oh you'd love it.

Many a woman has tried to snare me.

Many a woman has failed.

...

I can't get down like that.

I'm a SLUT man.
I dig short skirts, high heels, heavy on the makeup, light on the clothing.

When a chick reaches "that point" and starts going into bride-mode, the understanding seems to be they have to ration the sex, keep their man under control - so all that promiscuous nastiness goes out the window.

AmIRite?

What I don't get in so many circumstances is - I mean, I know marriage is a home run for so many men;

It's an improvement from their bachelor lifestyles of social reclusion and fervent lonely masturbation; now they have a partner, a real person to make coitus with on a relatively frequent basis (I understand the norm after 5 years is like, a semi-annual subscription?).

But what I don't get is how some man can basically accept a chick that used to throw it about like pass-the-parcel to alpha-frat-boys, and now holds out and doesn't do a fraction of the nasty kinky hijinx she got up to in her youth, with them?

I couldn't live like that.

I would sooner tie a mill-stone about my neck, and go old testament on ya'll.

The 1950's called, they want their words back.

Obvious Desperate Breakfasts

Title and post don’t match.

alchemist33

Aaron Jolly Farmyard wrote: »

Oh yes.

AmIRite?

Nope

anewme

Aaron Jolly Farmyard wrote: »

Many a woman has tried to snare me.

Many a woman has failed.

They are probably still celebrating.

Stanford

Is it 1st April already?

corner of hells

anewme wrote: »

They are probably still celebrating.

Wonder what they tried snaring him with.

Maybe a Stanley blade.

Stanford

Barbed wire hopefully

EmmetSpiceland

anewme wrote: »

They are probably still celebrating.

Incelebrating.

stateofflux

What does 'Snaring' mean?

[Deleted User]

You know you're listening to some clueless b@stard when they shíte on about sex as if it's the be all and end all of a relationship. It's important, but nowhere as important as friendship and having the Craic with someone you get on with.

Listen, Easter is less than 6 months away, hopefully you get a lovely chocolate chick to eat.

Bullocks

I really like the sound of this social reclusion and fervent lonely masturbation craic.

Fr_Dougal

Aaron Jolly Farmyard wrote: »

Oh yes.

Oh you'd love it.

Many a woman has tried to snare me.

Many a woman has failed.

...

I can't get down like that.

I'm a SLUT man.
I dig short skirts, high heels, heavy on the makeup, light on the clothing.

When a chick reaches "that point" and starts going into bride-mode, the understanding seems to be they have to ration the sex, keep their man under control - so all that promiscuous nastiness goes out the window.

AmIRite?

What I don't get in so many circumstances is - I mean, I know marriage is a home run for so many men;

It's an improvement from their bachelor lifestyles of social reclusion and fervent lonely masturbation; now they have a partner, a real person to make coitus with on a relatively frequent basis (I understand the norm after 5 years is like, a semi-annual subscription?).

But what I don't get is how some man can basically accept a chick that used to throw it about like pass-the-parcel to alpha-frat-boys, and now holds out and doesn't do a fraction of the nasty kinky hijinx she got up to in her youth, with them?

I couldn't live like that.

I would sooner tie a mill-stone about my neck, and go old testament on ya'll.

Stupid rambling sh1t like this is what gives AH a bad name. Would you not just go have a **** or something and save us from your inane BS?

Monokne

Aaron Jolly Farmyard wrote: »

Oh yes.

Oh you'd love it.

Many a woman has tried to snare me.

Many a woman has failed.

...

I can't get down like that.

I'm a SLUT man.
I dig short skirts, high heels, heavy on the makeup, light on the clothing.

When a chick reaches "that point" and starts going into bride-mode, the understanding seems to be they have to ration the sex, keep their man under control - so all that promiscuous nastiness goes out the window.

AmIRite?

What I don't get in so many circumstances is - I mean, I know marriage is a home run for so many men;

It's an improvement from their bachelor lifestyles of social reclusion and fervent lonely masturbation; now they have a partner, a real person to make coitus with on a relatively frequent basis (I understand the norm after 5 years is like, a semi-annual subscription?).

But what I don't get is how some man can basically accept a chick that used to throw it about like pass-the-parcel to alpha-frat-boys, and now holds out and doesn't do a fraction of the nasty kinky hijinx she got up to in her youth, with them?

I couldn't live like that.

I would sooner tie a mill-stone about my neck, and go old testament on ya'll.

This has to be written by a teenager.

Dial Hard

alchemist33 wrote: »

Nope

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Unlike the OP.

relax carry on

Aaron Jolly Farmyard wrote: »

Oh yes.

Oh you'd love it.

Many a woman has tried to snare me.

Many a woman has failed.

...

I can't get down like that.

I'm a SLUT man.
I dig short skirts, high heels, heavy on the makeup, light on the clothing.

When a chick reaches "that point" and starts going into bride-mode, the understanding seems to be they have to ration the sex, keep their man under control - so all that promiscuous nastiness goes out the window.

AmIRite?

What I don't get in so many circumstances is - I mean, I know marriage is a home run for so many men;

It's an improvement from their bachelor lifestyles of social reclusion and fervent lonely masturbation; now they have a partner, a real person to make coitus with on a relatively frequent basis (I understand the norm after 5 years is like, a semi-annual subscription?).

But what I don't get is how some man can basically accept a chick that used to throw it about like pass-the-parcel to alpha-frat-boys, and now holds out and doesn't do a fraction of the nasty kinky hijinx she got up to in her youth, with them?

I couldn't live like that.

I would sooner tie a mill-stone about my neck, and go old testament on ya'll.

God, what waste of words. What did the English language ever do to you to be wasted on such an arse water post?

anewme

relax carry on wrote: »

wasted on such an arse water post?

Arse water made me laugh.

Post really is such a load of scutter.

Obvious Desperate Breakfasts

Deleted User wrote: »

You know you're listening to some clueless b@stard when they shíte on about sex as if it's the be all and end all of a relationship. It's important, but nowhere as important as friendship and having the Craic with someone you get on with.

Listen, Easter is less than 6 months away, hopefully you get a lovely chocolate chick to eat.

Ah no, it’s just as important as those things, IMO.

Your Face

Exceptionally bad trolling.

buried

Old Testament Ya'll

Real wrath of God type stuff

Cats and dogs living together

All a dat

One eyed Jack

Aaron Jolly Farmyard wrote: »

But what I don't get is how some man can basically accept a chick that used to throw it about like pass-the-parcel to alpha-frat-boys, and now holds out and doesn't do a fraction of the nasty kinky hijinx she got up to in her youth, with them?

I couldn't live like that.

I would sooner tie a mill-stone about my neck, and go old testament on ya'll.

The most obvious explanation, or one of them anyway, is that people’s expectations change over time as they mature. The key point there is that people generally mature as they age, based upon their various experiences, not necessarily that their expectations change simply as a result of the biological aging process.

That’s why some people remain young in spirit as it were, throwing it about like pass the parcel, and some people whose expectations of themselves and expectations of other people - they choose a different lifestyle.

The reason some men don’t want a woman who’s still into doing kinky **** she did in her youth is simply because their expectations of themselves has changed, and their expectations of women have changed.

It goes both ways btw - there are plenty of women who much like yourself who couldn’t live like that with a man who is no longer the alpha-frat-boy with the six pack and the stamina of a stallion on coke who was known for knowing his way around a woman’s body during his youth, and there are plenty of women who couldn’t live with an aging frat-boy.

Beechwoodspark

Gremlinnnnnnnn

Beechwoodspark

Ration the sex?

Pass the parcel???

Nasty kinky hi jinx??!

bo0li5eumx12kp

One eyed Jack wrote: »

The most obvious explanation, or one of them anyway, is that people’s expectations change over time as they mature. The key point there is that people generally mature as they age, based upon their various experiences, not necessarily that their expectations change simply as a result of the biological aging process.

That’s why some people remain young in spirit as it were, throwing it about like pass the parcel, and some people whose expectations of themselves and expectations of other people - they choose a different lifestyle.

The reason some men don’t want a woman who’s still into doing kinky **** she did in her youth is simply because their expectations of themselves has changed, and their expectations of women have changed.

It goes both ways btw - there are plenty of women who much like yourself who couldn’t live like that with a man who is no longer the alpha-frat-boy with the six pack and the stamina of a stallion on coke who was known for knowing his way around a woman’s body during his youth, and there are plenty of women who couldn’t live with an aging frat-boy.

Is this just a pacifying response, or do you actually believe this bullshinanigans?

I mean, I get it - whatever you gotta tell yourself but;

You wanna know what happens to those that "mature" and "give up on the idea" of good nasty?

They become frustrated, hagared, dis-satisfied - and sometimes ghey.

As for women that "couldn't live without it?".

I don't know any married chick that hasn't made the compromise.
They all secretly resent not having access to their youthful days when they could go to the local in a suggestive outfit and get got.

But with age comes the need for companionship, stability, and a whole bunch of other age related necessities - so the trade off must be made.

This bullshinanigans of expectations shifting??

lolwut?

Ipso

It's difficult to type with your hands poking out of a straight jacket.

LaFuton

Aaron Jolly Farmyard wrote: »

Oh yes.

Oh you'd love it.

Many a woman has tried to snare me.

Many a woman has failed.

...

I can't get down like that.

I'm a SLUT man.
I dig short skirts, high heels, heavy on the makeup, light on the clothing.

When a chick reaches "that point" and starts going into bride-mode, the understanding seems to be they have to ration the sex, keep their man under control - so all that promiscuous nastiness goes out the window.

AmIRite?

What I don't get in so many circumstances is - I mean, I know marriage is a home run for so many men;

It's an improvement from their bachelor lifestyles of social reclusion and fervent lonely masturbation; now they have a partner, a real person to make coitus with on a relatively frequent basis (I understand the norm after 5 years is like, a semi-annual subscription?).

But what I don't get is how some man can basically accept a chick that used to throw it about like pass-the-parcel to alpha-frat-boys, and now holds out and doesn't do a fraction of the nasty kinky hijinx she got up to in her youth, with them?

I couldn't live like that.

I would sooner tie a mill-stone about my neck, and go old testament on ya'll.

...

jj880 wrote: »

cj maxx

To answer the OP, women in their mid to late 30's and men approaching 40 are like that.
Instinct. Survival of the species

Leg End Reject

LaptopGremlin, the man who wouldn't recognise a vagina if one sat on his face.

It's tragic at this point.

LaFuton

loves the threads where alot of the replies are also from the OP