gozunda wrote: » Furious smiley faces? Hows that work? Like are they happy and furious at the same time? :
IAMAMORON wrote: » She is just a distraction. As long as she is grabbing the headlines the less anything will get done. The tasks get rearranged. All the PR teams now combat the Greta girl as opposed to combatting climate change. She is a waste of time. As I said, as long as she grabs the headlines their is less time to expose climate change …. easy game for the bad guys.
gozunda wrote: » Furious smiley faces? Hows that work? Like are they happy and furious at the same time?
Micky 32 wrote: » Yes i did, for good reason.
Tell me how wrote: » Well, since she started her protest, the EU has declared a Climate Emergency and NZ has also done similar...
Tell me how wrote: » Well, since she started her protest, the EU has declared a Climate Emergency and NZ has also done similar. I'm not saying that that's it the hard work is done, but I think it is entirely plausible that they have been supported by if not outright swayed by the attention which Greta and the global marches have done to show where public sentiment is on the topic.
Gods Gift wrote: » Why didn’t Greta go to China and put in a few days lecturing the government there on pollution. They love their coal burning power plants.
Fr_Dougal wrote: » It’s probably because they’re a great bunch of lads and Greta didn’t want to upset them.
Gods Gift wrote: » Because she’d be told where to go, or put to work in a mine. Better go to the soft touch countries.
Thelonious Monk wrote: » Pretty much. Shes doing what she can in the more civilised countries, so far.
gozunda wrote: » There was also earthquake in the Mediterranean and a volcanic eruption in New Zealand - should we attribute those to St Greta as well? Wow she really is amazing eh!
God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change; courage to change the things I can; and wisdom to know the difference.
Tell me how wrote: » I posted this yesterday as I thought it would be useful to some to help understand what can and cannot be done.Although, maybe, simply, the wisdom to differentiate is lacking. I mean, that's the only thing that makes sense reading your post. Or maybe you discount all things religious in a similar manner to all things scientific.
Galwayguy35 wrote: » So making faces at Trump and having temper tantrums about ruined dreams are the criteria for becoming Time magazines person of the year it seems.
Tell me how wrote: » Have you 11,000 scientists signing a letter supporting your argument?
gozunda wrote: » Prayers? :pac:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serenity_Prayer Nah not into religous mumbo jumbo tbh. Most scientists aren't either funnily enough ... I note a bit of the old ad hominem again there. But no worries - but if you would like to reflect on the question asked that would be great
Tell me how wrote: » If you think asking is Greta responsible for natural events, I'm going to disappoint you by giving it the non-answer it deserves.No ad hominem by the way, just reacting to your specific comments and contribution accordingly. Ignoring that the publication of the quote was in a religious context, the content can still be considered in terms if analysis of how people view things. As was done here.
Micky 32 wrote: » What are you on about? Greta’s cult followers didn’t sign anything. Regardless of who is right or wrong people are entitled to have an opinion without being blocked or accused of being a troll. It’s a cult period.
Tell me how wrote: » Nobody suggested you are a troll. Well, I certainly didn't anyway. I said that you are misinformed on the climate issue if you don't think there is a problem or that the effort Greta is doing is not to be applauded. Also, do you see any hypocrisy in getting bothered about being called a troll (which, again, I didn't do) and repeatedly calling people who support Greta as being cultists.
gozunda wrote: » Furious smiley faces? :pac:
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » The one trillion euro climate debt generated today will filter down to the poorest in society and make them even poorer Wake up working class you are getting fcuked
Tell me how wrote: » How would you propose dealing with the debt? Do you think Greta is advocating for making the poor even poorer?
Chris_Heilong wrote: » This is almost as bad as Obama getting a Nobel peace prize when he first became president...for no reason at all except because he is Black, it is all politics and proping up your own political beliefs over any sense of integrity, the TIMES should be ashamed.