L1011 wrote: » The peak time services are completely rammed in the peak direction. Were they expecting people to hang off the outsides?
roadmaster wrote: » This is one thing I don’t understand is I have heard several people saying it’s not busy yet anytime I use it like you say the trains are rammed with people in. Besides it does not operate between 10 and 4 so that’s bound to hit the figures
L1011 wrote: » The anti-peak direction is vastly less busy than Maynooth Connolly trains but that's because they serve Maynooth mostly - the college provides the reverse time flow. Also no connections to DART. Even the last train in and the first train out are busy in the peak direction, with the core ones crush capacity Monday-Thursday at least
DubInMeath wrote: » If a train service was available from Navan I'd use it rather than driving 30 minutes to the M3, but given that the train service from Navan was supposed to be available by the time the motorway was completed as an alternative, I won't be holding my breath.
Seth Brundle wrote: » Didn't the motorway design and construction pretty much signal the death of any possibility if reopening the train line to Navan?
CatInABox wrote: » I'd expect that any extension out to Navan would be started/completed after the Dart Expansion has electrified the line out to M3 Parkway. This would mean that trains would be more frequent and larger than the ones currently used on that line.
magicbastarder wrote: » you mean where the old line would have crossed the now M3 at junction 8?
L1011 wrote: » The headshunt already runs through that junction in a box, it's the dunshauglin bridge that's a problem
ncounties wrote: » Meath County Council sharing a survey related to the reopening of the line on multiple social media accounts.Twitter post below, but importantly on Facebook, they state that if a decision was made to proceed, the line could be operational by 2026.https://twitter.com/meathcoco/status/1357026235306692609?s=20
Rulmeq wrote: » That's some spotless ballast in that photo. The survey is kind of bad, single answer options to questions that can have multiple answers (What do you go to Dublin for, 6 answers, but a radio button to allow single selection). It also doesn't seem to have any real direction, so it's really difficult to figure out what they are trying to discover.
LuckyLloyd wrote: » Never going to be built, imo.
SeanW wrote: » They really need to figure out "if" there is demand? Has Meath Co. Co. (among others) failed to notice what's been happening in the Greater Dublin Area over the past 10-odd years? I guarantee that if the Navan line were built and the areas around the stations were rezoned high density residential, any service would be maxed out within 5 years, like every other short haul railway (DART, Commuter, Luas) into the city.
poker--addict wrote: » True, but in the meantime the buses go several times an hour, are pretty fast usually, and are practically empty. "built it and they will come" springs to mind, but the current use of public transport is a great way for the powers that be to "prove" it is not needed. Train should have been done with the motorway.
donvito99 wrote: » Wasn't the 109/109X leaving people behind before it had gotten out of Navan pre-pandemic? A single four car 29000 train would carry almost 800 people. Probably about 8-9 bus loads.
poker--addict wrote: » True, but in the meantime the buses go several times an hour, are pretty fast usually, and are practically empty. "built it and they will come" springs to mind, but the current use of public transport is a great way for the powers that be to "prove" it is not needed.