LuckyLloyd wrote: » As always, I ask why restoration of passenger services on the existing line via Drogheda (used daily by freight trains) isn’t an option?
Del.Monte wrote: » CIE/IE.
Seanmk1 wrote: » The train via Drogheda should be feasible by altering existing Drogheda-Dublin services to start from Navan with a new platform in Drogheda to pick up passengers. However, the journey time wouldn't be great. Drogheda-Connolly takes about an hour and you could add, say 20 mins, to that to a journey from Navan.
Del.Monte wrote: » Timed to connect with the Enterprise quite good times could be achieved, but that would depend on max speeds on the revamped branch.
Del.Monte wrote: » I can't tell you whether it's been relaid recently as I haven't travelled over it since 1990 - probably before some posters here were born.
horseburger wrote: » where did you come across the photo?
Evil-1 wrote: » And that right there is not just the heart of the issue, but its also the perfect problem for a rail service to fix, a lot of that traffic would use a rail service if it were available.
horseburger wrote: » Does anyone know, why it is, that none of the various rail services to and/or from Dublin, operate throughout the night? ]
Responding to a question from the Meath Chronicle, Minister Ross said he was aware that the National Transport Authority had briefed Meath County Council just last week on the matter where they indicated that a review would begin in late 2020 and be completed by mid 2021 as part of the National Transport Strategy.
Agent_47 wrote: » Yeah, saw the article in the Chronicle, what criteria will they use to determine viability so we can ensure they give it proper consideration?
Lord Glentoran wrote: » It will have to jump over the fuggin’ moon before Finance and the Doherty and Nesbitt School of Economics give permission for Official Ireland to even give it consideration.
cgcsb wrote: » Where will trains go when they get to the city? Chronic under investment and neglect for decades has limited capacity.
disposableFish wrote: » Do they still own the land beside docklands station? It's close enough to both the Sligo and Northern lines that it could be connected with fairly minor rejigging. Maybe I'm being a bit naive here but if they wanted to reduce demand on Connolly couldn't they just build a proper station at dockland and have it serve as terminus. It wouldn't solve some of the problems, but it should stop Connolly itself being a bottle-neck. It could even have offices built on top as has been done elsewhere.
CatInABox wrote: » There's a question mark over the future of the current Docklands station, as the passenger numbers there haven't been what they expected at all. Hardly surprising, to be all that honest, what with it being relatively out of the way and close to some unsavoury locations. They're currently deciding on if they should move it, with the new location being down beside park lane, where the Europcar place is. In my mind, that'd be a great place, but they should also keep the current docklands station as well, it'd be handy to have in the future.
cgcsb wrote: » I'm beginning to think that we will not see the station relocated to europcar. CIE have taken on their own designers for the dart expansion plan, under the dead hand of CIE management means little will materialise from this, eventually a consultant will be taken on and at that stage the budget will only get us the hybrid trains and a few closed level crossings Also with the UK now in recession there'll be talk of recession here soon enough so we cam forget the cap ex budget for public transport being close to what has been promised. We seen the liffey cycle route publicly canned this weekend due to budget constraints and it looks bad for metrolink. A paired back bus connects, 10 minute darts, 24 hr buses, luas bxd, some closed level crossongs and hybrid trains will probably be the extent of pt improvements during this economic cycle. And actually thats not half bad compared to the previous economic boom. Almost a century behind the capitald of Europe though
Zebra3 wrote: » Last boom gave us the original two Luas lines, double tracking of Clonsilla-Maynooth, and M3/Pace extension. Just off the top of my head.
cgcsb wrote: » It also gave us one of the world's most extensive motorway networks per head. This boom and bust will naturally be smaller in scale though