FFVII wrote: » Bit of fecking will power is all anyone needs.
CFlat wrote: » Jazsus lads he said he was on the beer for 10 days not 10 years. Librium? AA? GP? Look, assuming you're just pissed off with something and you went on a bender to forget about it which is what this sounds like to me, tomorrow morning just stay in bed all day. You need to eat but just go back to bed after you've done that. Eat well though. Stay warm in bed, electric blanket, hot water bottle whatever makes you comfortable. The following day you'll feel better and so on. I think you just need to snap out of whatever this thing is you're going through
Doctors room ghost wrote: » Remarkably well typed for someone on a ten day session who should be rattling and shaking like a dog taking a sh1te. 1/10 for effort but on the off chance that any of that could be real,go to your gp and ask to be medically detoxed on Librium to reduce the chance of suffering a seizure.
ArchXStanton wrote: » My GP has pulled me back from the brink many times, god bless her, in the end you'll just have to except you'll never win in the battle with the bottle
tdf7187 wrote: » Rubbish and dangerous rubbish at that. Withdrawal from alcohol can literally cause death in very heavy drinkers. Withdrawal from heroin, for example, can't do that. These are the medical facts. Sorry if they don't fit your incorrect ideas.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I suppose that entirely depends on your end game and how you picture "winning" in your head. Whether or not you will win against the bottle depends entirely on what "winning" even means to you in the first place. One has to decide what winning looks like. For example - I have known some deep alcoholics who have now been off the bottle for 20 even 30 years. That would be victory in my book. But that is just my book not theirs. They - wisely enough - still identify as alcoholics. They look at it as a long series of victories in a war that will never really end until they die. And only then can victory or defeat be declared. But they will not declare victory now because they fear one of alcohols most insidious and dangerous weapons in that war. Complacency.
Feisar wrote: » It's a ten day bender, loads of people go on hols for ten days getting hammered everyday, come back and go cold turkey.
ArchXStanton wrote: » victory for me was excepting defeat, I was never going going to be able to drink like a normal person again
Stacksofwacks wrote: » Loads of people who are either very young or else stone cold alcos..
Deleted User wrote: » I think that is what I meant by "what victory looks like to you". You are framing that concession as defeat. And I can understand why. It is not "wrong". But other people would not frame it that way and it is not "wrong" either. For them. Rather they frame it as "I am going to change my life - alcohol is not going to be a part of it any more - and achieving that is victory". So they are essentially doing exactly what you did. But what you call defeat - they call victory. And it works for both of you. So that is good. Either way the first step seems the same for all of you. Identify for yourself what "victory" is for you - what it looks like and what it means to you - and strive to realise that vision. As for alcoholics who strive for controlled drinking - moderate drinking - some do achieve it. Others - as you rightly point out - fail dramatically. It is not something unattainable by any means. But it is far from a given either and I reckon many are deluded when they think it is the right option for them. But we can not know either way for any given individual until they try. There is something eye opening however about hearing someone in a place like AA stand up and say "Hi I am Mike - I am an alcoholic - I have not had a drink for 40 years". First reaction is "Whhhhhhaaaaa???". But then you realise what they are saying at it is quite moving.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I think that is what I meant by "what victory looks like to you". You are framing that concession as defeat. And I can understand why. It is not "wrong". But other people would not frame it that way and it is not "wrong" either. For them. Rather they frame it as "I am going to change my life - alcohol is not going to be a part of it any more - and achieving that is victory". So they are essentially doing exactly what you did. But what you call defeat - they call victory. And it works for both of you. So that is good. Either way the first step seems the same for all of you. Identify for yourself what "victory" is for you - what it looks like and what it means to you - and strive to realise that vision. As for alcoholics who strive for controlled drinking - moderate drinking - some do achieve it. Others - as you rightly point out - fail dramatically. It is not something unattainable by any means. But it is far from a given either and I reckon many are deluded when they think it is the right option for them. But we can not know either way for any given individual until they try. There is something eye opening however about hearing someone in a place like AA stand up and say "Hi I am Mike - I am an alcoholic - I have not had a drink for 40 years". First reaction is "Whhhhhhaaaaa???". But then you realise what they are saying at it is quite moving.
tdf7187 wrote: » It wouldn't work if it wasn't anonymous.
ArchXStanton wrote: » Some can return to moderate drinking and I've often wondered how they do it
Feisar wrote: » Either or, cold turkey of a ten day bender isn't going to kill you.
Deleted User wrote: » That is not at all an assumption I would feel safe making without a lot of testing and data. And comparisons to other methods that are not based on it. Quite the opposite actually as the inability to get testing and data means we can not test the efficacy of their methods. And even if we magically just assume their methods to be useful - we can not test whether they are being applied consistently or at all in any given chapter presuming to bear the brand.
Feisar wrote: »
tdf7187 wrote: » I've listened to him 'do a chair'. I'm not breaching anonymity, he has spoken about his alcoholism in numerous public interviews.
Ace Attorney wrote: » Op first thing first have a shower and shave you will feel better. 2. Switch on a tv show you like, play video games or netflix for the day. 3. Get a lot of junk food i.e pizza crisps etc and some water or softdrinks for the day and just take it easy for theday batten down the hatches and turn off your phone untill tomorow. Just chill out for the day and relax.
tdf7187 wrote: » We don't disagree. I was just saying that anonymity is foundation of our traditions is the reason AA works - for those for whom it works. I make no claims regarding its success rate.
Still waters wrote: » He's the worst type of alcoholic, just because he gave it up means everyone else should as well, he wrote and performed better when he was boozin, now he's just a miserable old prick who thinks he's better than everyone who does drink, I've been to one of his shows in vicar street and another in lisdoonvarna and he wants the bar shut down and no one can sing along, he's forgotten what a good time is, he should retire if people enjoying themselves that much bother him
Deleted User wrote: » Again I think I would just stay sceptical until I had more data. My suspicion is that AA works - for the few people it actually works for - not because of anything to do with anonymity but solely because it is a mutual social support group of understanding peers. And I suspect that trait - more than any other - is the grounding for the success they might have. And the even better success other groups have. To the point I suspect AA has it's rare successes not because of it's processes and ideas but _despite_ them. And the power of it being a social support network dilutes the bad effects of some of their more nonsense and dangerous practices.