Sligo eye wrote: » Actually I have.
Greaney wrote: » Indeed, it should be about planning for the future. 1)The commuting population that work in Galway city but live in the county is now at it's highest at 50% 2) The top 3 commuter towns in the county are Oranmore, Tuam & Athenry in that order, of course they should be linked. 3) Athenry is an Education hub with three secondary schools and students coming from all directions to attend them. 4) Athenry is also a 'disabled services' hub, as is Tuam (with an Irish Wheelchair Assoc. regional office) 5) Many post offices have closed since 'decades ago' (eg; Ballyglunin) so many of our citizens who don't/cannot drive need infrastructure to link them to vital public services 6) This issue is bigger than Galway, there are rail advocacy groups all over the Island, hoping to link Derry to Cork with all our airports along the way. And that most certainly is worth planning for.....
Isambard wrote: » well of course if someone did really want to take the train from Derry to Cork, there's nothing to stop them doing that now, with changes , (and if a demand were to be shown , a through train wouldn't be impossible). I'm betting no-one has actually done that journey recently.
Muckyboots wrote: » You think people would want to get a train from Derry to Cork? One that meanders through south Mayo and north Galway with over 16 road crossings in less than a 20km stretch, reducing the average speed to less than 50kmph? I think Sinn Fein should be aiming much higher than that if they think they come back from the EU with a 1/2 billion euros in their back pockets for the West of Ireland.
Deleted User wrote: » Nobody is anti mass transit here. Most are anti waste of money though For the money to get Athenry to Tuam up and running, you would put in bus lanes all the way from Tuam to Galway, Moycullen to Galway, Loughrea to Galway etc and move a hell of a lot more people a hell of a lot faster As for people not wanting to use buses, Burkes alone puts that silly argument to rest with their schedule which reflects the real demand
Greaney wrote: » Well, we could ignore building any infrastructure and just drive everywhere... And look where that leads us Furthermore, loads of people have no option but to use public transport, and many folk don't like getting the 'vomit comet' (bus) I have no idea, how folk who are so anti-mass transit, figure how our country is going to develop, but I can tell you, our cities are bound up with traffic and not getting any less congested.
donvito99 wrote: » Nor should we be justifying railways on the basis that one existed decades ago.
Greaney wrote: » Here here, most of us use it for commuting. Rail & Bike are a terrific combo.
donvito99 wrote: » We should not be justifying railways on the basis that it would encourage recreational cycling.
end of the road wrote: » well actually, voting out politicians who happened to block a greenway that is probably unlikely to be built anyway, isn't of itself proof that the vast majority of people in east galway share the difference of opinion. what it does show, is that those politicians in general weren't delivering enough, and were not meeting the expectations of the people they were originally elected to serve. even if they supported the greenway, if they were crap over all and not delivering, then they probably would still be out.
Deleted User wrote: » A different opinion is not bullying. The facts are that the difference of opinion is held by the vast majority of people in East Galway as shown by the fact that a number of politicians blocking the greenway were voted out in the last local elections. I'm looking forward to this meeting on Thursday. Can't wait to meet the only 3 members of Flag too
Greaney wrote: » There's a meeting regarding EU funding and the Western Rail Corridor hosted by Sinn Féin next Thursday (12th December) in the local community Hall in Athenry. I'd love is these meetings were cross party, however, alas, this became a loaded issue last year and many politicians were bullied over it so it kinda takes guts to stand up and say 'actually, I've a different opinion' at the moment. As a carer with my sister a member of the Wheelchair Assoc., I know that train is a lifeline for her....https://www.facebook.com/events/2336790123301860/
Greaney wrote: » There's a meeting regarding EU funding and the Western Rail Corridor hosted by Sinn Féin next Thursday (12th December) in the local community Hall in Athenry. I'd love is these meetings were cross party, however, alas, this became a loaded issue last year and many politicians were bullied over it so it kinda takes guts to stand up and say 'actually, I've a different opinion' at the moment.https://www.facebook.com/events/2336790123301860/
Carawaystick wrote: » Is there a Greenway on the Waterford and Tramore railway? Is that the one at Jack Meades?
blackwhite wrote: » Waterford & Tramore railway closed in 1960, so just shy of 6 decades for there
blackwhite wrote: » I don’t think it was a typo - there weren’t many railways 700 years ago Waterford & Tramore railway closed in 1960, so just shy of 6 decades for there
serfboard wrote: » Begging the question - how many decades must a railway line be closed before it can be considered for a Greenway? In the case of Westport, the answer was seven (1937-2011). We've a bit to go yet!
westtip wrote: » SevenTY! not seven!:D yep realise it was a typo!
serfboard wrote: » If you only extend the route to Tuam, and do not extend it to Claremorris, then it will not allow for through journeys from Castlebar/Ballina etc. Then, when it inevitably fails, you will have railway supporters on here saying that it failed because it was not extended to Claremorris. In other words, if you're going to do it, build it to Claremorris - or don't do it at all.
westtip wrote: » In a speech at a conference about the Western Rail Corridor in May 2009. Mr O’Cuiv when Minister for Community and Gaeltacht affairs said: “should we use the section of the railway line north of Claremorris as a walkway and cycleway while it is not open as railway?”