MaceFace wrote: » I only used the Luas as an example as the costs are well known so easy to compare to the known costs of the M7 works. I'm guessing trains would be much more expensive, strengthening the point I am making. I've often heard the argument that what do you do with the additional bus/train capacity outside of peak hours. After 10am, the demand will decrease maybe 90% so what do you do with the buses and drivers? Drive empty buses around all day? Send them home only to come back at 3pm for the start of the return journey?Increased train frequency - there are 10 trains that arrive in Heuston between 7am and 9am. Are these trains full that people can't get on or so overcrowded that people are avoiding them? Its a long time since I took the train from Sallins in the morning, but I always felt the problem was more that it left you on the outskirts of the city. The train was often standing room when I used to get it, but it was only a 30 min journey which was fine. Personally, I don't reducing the time from 30 mins to 20 mins will make much of a difference to anyone. P+R: Absolutely. It's crazy more is not being done on it and the recent decision by Irish Rail not to take advantage of the vacant underground carpark adjacent to Sallins station is crazy. 200+ spaces. Anyway, I am not trying to make a case against further investment in public transport along the N7 route, but I'd put up a counter argument that we need more roads. A high speed outer orbital route basically along the border of Dublin because as of now, to get from Naas to Bray, it almost always means going the M50. This would immediately reduce the demand on the M50 and all approaching roads. It should be significantly cheaper than any public transport option and allow people who work in Kildare to commute to South Dublin without needing to go get a train into the city, a luas across town and a Dart/Luas/Bus back out. Sorry, just rambling...
donvito99 wrote: » I like how you argued against the public transport solution (Luas) because it was loss making. What revenues does the M7 bring in?? And as for the suggestion to bypass the M50 from Naas to Bray, I would refer you to the .... M50. Any and all traffic removed from the M50 by another bypass will be filled. The bypass will then be filled. Then we will be calling for a bypass of that bypass of the M50. This happens and has happened every where else in the world and there is nothing to suggest that Dublin will be any different.
MaceFace wrote: » So, what will it take to get a person from newbridge, Naas or Kildare town to Sandyford, Blackrock, Blanchardstown, or the 100 other places in under an hour?
And yes, build another m50, and as Dublin continues to grow build another and another. And do it in combination with additional public transport. It’s not either or but both.
GhostyMcGhost wrote: » Didn't know December was in Autumn
WishUWereHere wrote: » Serious build up last night to exit J10 SB. This was around 19h30. I gave up & drove on to J12. Anyone know what the reason was for the build up?
WhatsGoingOn2 wrote: » Was it because of the protests at Aldi?
Darc19 wrote: » Autumn runs Sept to Nov in terms of metrology and general concensus
Geogregor wrote: » Astronomical autumn ends on December 22 Just sayin'...
spacetweek wrote: » We use Gaelic Seasons in Ireland which are different from everyone else's. Winter here is Nov, Dec, Jan, everywhere else is Dec, Jan, Feb
jmkennedyie wrote: » Indo page 8 Today suggests speed limit remains 80 for most sections and 100 for some areas Dublin bound around the merge, all until dec 23rd. I thought would be safer open j9a before bumping up to 120...I guess this is now a possibility
Darc19 wrote: » I don't think the speed restrictions are causing any problems and haven't seen either a speed van or garda check. So if it means jct 9a opening, I'll take it Hopefully the jct 10 roundabouts will open next week, that will ease the evening tailbacks from Naas
_Kaiser_ wrote: » So now it's NOT going to be back to 120 in the morning as was suggested here several times quoting sources within the project? Another delay.. what a surprise! :rolleyes: And that's not even getting into the "ready to go but..not!" junctions. The management and delivery of this entire endeavour (and the knock-on effects to local traffic, commuting, lost productivity etc) has been piss poor from the start! But, I won't hold my breath that any penalities will be imposed or that the Councils/NRA (or whatever they call themselves this week) will learn something from it.
WishUWereHere wrote: » Hard to disagree with one word You say here. Speaking of penalties, is there any way of finding out if and when and how much penalties were incurred?
yannakis wrote: » I might have lost the valuable bit of info in the last few pages, but can I as, is J9a opening tomorrow 9 Dec or is it still unclear?
BuzzFish wrote: » It will legally be 120 tomorrow. All the orders to restrict the speed expire tonight at midnight and Kildare Co.Co have not published any new ones, as they are legally obliged to do if they wish to continue the restrictions. Thats not to say the signage remains for a while until the contractor picks it up.http://kildare.ie/CountyCouncil/PressReleasesAdverts/TemporaryRoadWorksSpeedLimitOrderM9M7N7.htmlThis Road Works Speed Limit Order will apply from Sunday, 1 December 2019 to Sunday, 8 December 2019 inclusive. All other previous can be found here if you wish to review:http://kildare.ie/countycouncil/index.html If you need further evidence: http://www.m7upgrade.com/ "M7 Motorway Traffic Update - 22 November 2019 The 80Km per hour speed restriction will be removed on the M7 Motorway and will return to 120Km per hour on 09th December 2019. "
_Kaiser_ wrote: Working from home myself today so haven't been on the roads yet. Are we back to 120 then? Junctions still closed?
harr wrote: » Was on it this morning... no difference a lot of people doing the 120 or above and a lot doing 80 or below. Surely if it’s back to 120 as it should be today they should have been removing old speed signs the way it is now is just dangerous.