flazio wrote: » Good on Chadwick I don't think she's eligible to be in contention for a Williams race seat (super licence points) but hopefully this won't be the last we'll see of her.
skipper_G wrote: » What is with the flag for Visser? That's not the Dutch flag, is it even a real flag?
AMKC wrote: » So there should be more tracks in this next year and they are thinking of going to America and Asia in 2021. Also testing is starting next month. That's quick. Awe its drivers they will be testing. Could be a great series that and I think it was a missed opportunity to not have made a series out of the drivers for this been picked from 60 to 20 could have been great.
LIGHTNING wrote: » Why should they be ashamed? Plenty of other sports don't get front page coverage on the news.
Bennett Bumpy Bear wrote: » I think you're getting at the fact that a women's series shouldn't get special treatment? I agree in the sporting sense, it gets the same treatment as other sports on a par with this. But the purpose is more than sporting - it's about breaking down barriers to equality - so the media coverage should follow suit. I wouldn't go as far as saying they should be ashamed, but the purpose of the series is undermined if it doesn't get any coverage
TCP/IP wrote: » There is perfect equality already if a female driver was quick enough they would be in F1 and winning championships fact is they are not and certainly don’t deserve special treatment in fact that would be inequality. F1 has enough support series with F2, F3 and Porsche certainly does not need a female racing series just to look with the times.
TCP/IP wrote: » F1 teams would take any person if they were quick enough. In fact a women would be marketing gold for a team. Fact is they are too slow at the highest level that is F1.
Bennett Bumpy Bear wrote: » Im not arguing what, I'm arguing why. On the point above i agree, but why don't we see women is the question. TCP IP gave an interesting answer. Anecdotal but would suggest there are few barriers to women. Personally I'm agnostic on the matter, but would require more solid evidence to convince me women don't find it more difficult. At the sharp end when you need your wits about you, being a woman in a male environment could distract now and again. And i mean that in terms of not having the same rapport as a group of lads. That can affect mood, positivity, performance. Tthat could be a podium vs outside the top ten. One simple, non tangible example of why. WS is a good experiment to see if such things matter
Deleted User wrote: » You're agnostic but your default position is that it would be harder for women? Hmmm.
Sonny noggs wrote: » Reverse grid is a gimmick. Wouldn’t be accepted in F1 where big money is at stake.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » I never understood this attitude. F1 is a sport, the entire thing is a made up gimmick. Reverse grid (in championship order) sprint race would be the best part of the weekend. Hamilton starting at the back beside verstappen, having to pass their way through the grid and battle each other. It would be amazing to watch. Cricket has a 5 day format which is great but difficult to watch. So they have shorter versions of the game. The recent 50 over, one day world cup was a massive success. I went to a 20 over match after work a couple of weeks ago. Great event. Lots of fun and it fit into the night. Started at 6.30 and finished at about 9.30. Perfect. There's even a shorter time limited version with about 15 overs. Cricket could have said "no. Short versions of cricket are too gimmicky. Can't be done". But they didn't and they have grown their fanbase enormously. It's sport. Not real life. They can do whatever they want because the entire event is a gimmick - a great gimmick.
LIGHTNING wrote: » I can tell you from personal experience they get much more opportunities at the lower levels.
Bennett Bumpy Bear wrote: » Well there are two potential reasons why we don't see women; they are either not as quick as men or they don't get the same opportunities. Are you saying, as it appears that you are, that women get all the opportunities men do? Men are just better at racing than women?
H3llR4iser wrote: » Well, there is an obvious third one and that is the lack of source material, in other words - very few girls even try to go for motorsports. Out of 100 guys who start racing in karts, maybe 1 will make it to Formula 1. If there aren't even the 100 girls to begin with, it goes without saying that getting one through all the hoops and in the maximum category will be nigh and impossible task.
muckwarrior wrote: » Yep. If only a tiny percentage of drivers in motorsport make it to F1, and only a tiny percentage of those drivers are female, then statistically the odds of a woman making it to F1 are extremely low. So the solution is to get more young girls interested in motorsport. That's a good reason why a series like this should be given more media attention than it otherwise deserves. If girls see women racing on the TV then it shows them it's not a sport just for men, and will hopefully encourage a lot more to take it up.
skipper_G wrote: » W series added to the support bill for two F1 races this season at Austin and Mexico. That's a pretty big development for a series only in it's second season.https://www.motorsport.com/w-series/news/support-bill-austin-mexico-f1/4651997/
astrofluff wrote: » I see Jamie Chadwick is driving in the F3 Asian series with Pinnacle Motorsport, which are an Irish team. I wonder if there's any way to catch some coverage as it looks competitive enough, plus it's very nice to hear the national anthem (missed the last round when one of the team's drivers won).