smelly sock wrote: » The more you would think about it the lads going back to the office full of gargle is strange. Not getting in and heading off again and remebering nothing about MIB. People here can argue that it was run of the mill stuff but have you ever gone back to your office at 3 4 or 5 AM full of beer?? Hiwmany here have done it. Regardless of that we cant even be sure about the time line. Time stamps on CCTV could be wrong or inaccurate. Its a case full of possible explanations and mystery. AGS seem to believe ot was a chance run in with a criminal gang operating in the area.
smelly sock wrote: » The more you would think about it the lads going back to the office full of gargle is strange. Not getting in and heading off again and remebering nothing about MIB. People here can argue that it was run of the mill stuff but have you ever gone back to your office at 3 4 or 5 AM full of beer?? Hiwmany here have done it.
chicorytip wrote: » In the wake of the Geoghan Quinn 1994 legislation there was a major crackdown by Gardai forcing most girls off the streets. It certainly was a lot more difficult to find sex for sale on the street in it's aftermath. Anybody living in or who was familiar with the Upper Mount St.,Herbert St, Wilton Place, Warrington Place, Upper Pembroke St and Fitzwilliam Square areas during the mid to late nineteen eighties would affirm this, I am sure.
Coconut12 wrote: » Street workers hadn’t ceased at that time in that area ! Google it
KWAG2019 wrote: » Because the police ask the questions and determined 19 years ago the others should be eliminated from enquiries. It’s not the place of posters with no access to the full information to set aside police conclusions. These people are irrelevant to the TD disappearance.
sugarman wrote: » Any links or quotes to that?
Fiftyfilthy wrote: » I don’t wish to sound disrespectful but td’s father has said in the last 24hrs that any altercation with a gang is nonsense. They also don’t believe suicide either, so I wonder what they must think ?
tara73 wrote: » yes, and why is there only one still image available? there must be footage of what they did at the gate, when they arrived, did they talk to MIB, how they left. It's just: they were work colleagues-alright, no more questions from anybody. why not?? who released the footage anyway? the guards? media? unknown source? I have the feeling there's just one story shown to the public, this MIB, first at the pillar, than at the gate. If they are so sure the work colleagues have nothing to do with it, why showing just one eerie still pic with three people standing outside of the gate instead of just withholding that pic. It started all kind of unnecessary?) speculation (and still does for me).
sugarman wrote: » Donal McIntyre / TV3 some how got hold of the full footage before the guards released it and showed in it their documentary.
tara73 wrote: » yes, and why is there only one still image available? there must be footage of what they did at the gate, when they arrived, did they talk to MIB, how they left. It's just: they were work colleagues-alright, no more questions from anybody. why not?
sugarman wrote: » I believe they were trying to get in themselves to collect their belongings but had no way in.
Beechwoodspark wrote: » I also find it strange that the two work colleagues were literally standing beside MIB at the gate but as far as I know they’ve never given an account of the night and their memories of MIB - was anything said etc.
Flippyfloppy wrote: » It's seems cold case detectives on YouTube did an episode on Trevor only a couple of months ago. They seem to put a lot of credence into the bank target theory.
noodler wrote: » Yeah, the area likely wasn't as quiet as the few isolated snippets weve seen would lead you to believe.
smelly sock wrote: » And thats the cctv we have access too. Id guess if you were to look at it the hour before and after TD went missing you'd see a lot more foot traffic. The area would be busy enough.
MonkieSocks wrote: » Trevor passes lamppost at 04-14-2530 secs later Man passes lamppost at 04-14-55 28 secs later Single female passes lamppost at 04-15-2335 secs later Couple passes lamppost at 04-15-58
Coconut12 wrote: » And it’s “a” clown and not “an”
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » Purest sign of an clown on the internet. Makes a statement and tells people to Google it if it needs to be clarified.
Fiftyfilthy wrote: » Is there any footage of the scantily clad woman?