noodler wrote: » So this gang had spotters in buck whaleys at 2am. Picked out TD somehow. Phones ahead. Spotters, cars etc. Hang around in the rain for a full hour. Have no idea if TD would come back out of the bank. Didn't think to hit an easier target in the interim. Oh, and btw, if you are wondering why they'd be so stupid as to get themselves on the gate CCTV..it's because they are on the gear (despite the elaborate premeditation described above).
20Wheel wrote: » Spotters, cars. Plural. Way to embellish what was said. Pathetic.
noodler wrote: » You used the EXACT words spotter and car. What on earth are you talking about? Nice imagination anyway, the curious tale of the out of it junky gang who planned the logistics of muggings hours in advance.
20Wheel wrote: » As someone in the other thread said, there is... Or at least was.... one more angle to look at. Phone calls. MIB takes at least two. Even on a burner phone the appropriate credit must be charged. So if your number makes a call at x time for x duration that must be recorded to calculate the price. Which phones made a call at both ~3:00 and ~3:30. Line up the times with the CCTV. To find mibs phone number. Can't have been many.
Jeff2 wrote: » There was a courier company van parked up on Mount Street at the bottom of Herbert Street around the dates. For a few nights.
Alliance123 wrote: » Sad but absolutely no chance of an accident - water or car imo. Altercation following interaction. Man at gate has answers and 100% guilty. Unknown motive, which is kinda irrelevant at this stage. Best wishes to his mates & family
20Wheel wrote: » As someone in the other thread said, there is... Or at least was.... one more angle to look at. Phone calls. MIB takes at least two. Even on a burner phone the appropriate credit must be charged. So if your number makes a call at x time for x duration that must be recorded to calculate the price. Which phones made a call at both ~3:00 and ~3:30. Line up the times with the CCTV. To find mibs phone number.Can't have been many.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » And to hang around in the cold and wet in full view of CCTV as part of the plan ? Hardly
dubstarr wrote: » Well full view or not,we dont know who the MIB is. It just takes one person having a conscience,and come forward.And this could be solved. The only reason MIB hasnt come forward is because hes the reason Trevor disappeared.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » No, there many different reasons why MIB has never been identified. 1. He could be deceased. 2. He could be some one that takes no interest in the news, we all know people who don't watch the news or read the papers so he might be totally unaware of all this. 3. He may have seen the Trevor Deely missing posters in the city but makes no connection with Trevor being the guy he talked to. How much media attention was there about looking for a man that talked to Trevor outside BOIAM during the early days of the case ? 4. He may have left the country for any one of hundreds of reasons.
dubstarr wrote: » How likely is all your scenerios or how likely is mone.Statistically the last person to see someone alive is the person that doen the crime. Plus how could you not realise the person you where talking to,in now missing. And the amount of coverage the case got,you would have to be on Mars or under a rock.
Day Lewin wrote: » Nothing in life is certain: but yet, this is mostly true. Cops always start an investigation like this with "Who saw him last?"
smelly sock wrote: » We have no idea who saw him last. Cctv is inconclusive. Imo suicide is the most logical explanation with the body being lost at sea. The premeditated gang thing is way off. There would be evidence of interaction if TD was involved with a gang.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » How much coverage was there of "the last person to see Trevor was an yet to be identified man standing outside BOIAM" back in December 2000 ? This guy may have no idea that the guy he talked to for a few seconds late that night is the same guy on the posters. For every missing person poster you see or hear about do you look into the circumstances and go back over your memory to figure if you might have interacted with them ? If the answer is no then put yourself in the shoes of MIB in December 2000.
tdf7187 wrote: » IMO it is these kinds of speculations that probably upset the family and got the last thread closed. There is literally no evidence for suicide - none at all.
dubstarr wrote: » If i was around the area the time they went missing.I would got to the guards,it just takes that small bit of information to crack it. And about would you remember what you where doing 20 years ago.Now i wouldnt but i would have 20 years ago.
John_Rambo wrote: » Every fit young healthy man? Speak for yourself BDI.
smelly sock wrote: » I think without being insensitive that the Deely family need to accept after 19 years people are going to speculate as to the outcome. Human nature and curiosity takes over here and theories are given. We could all just stop talking about it and forget it. That wouldn't be good either. As another poster rightly said its the media who mentioned and chance altercation with a criminal gang involved with brazzers. Not us. We are merely debating that theory.