iamstop wrote: » With the tech we have now surely we can test the possibility of a body falling into the canal or the Dodder and see where it ends up. Get a dummy like 'Buster' from Myth Busters. Make it same build and buoyancy as Trevor would have been. Slap a few trackers on it. Wait until there is similar weather conditions to that night and dump it into a likely entry point. The tracker will tell you if it would have made it past the locks on the canal and if it would have made it out to sea. Yeah, chances are the tides won't be the same but give it long enough to see where it gets to.
boombang wrote: » While this theory does probably need two men in the car (in order to load a body), I think it's the most plausible. I fully agree that the Leeson St area had loads of shady types and the gate footage is ominous, but death by drink driving has to be by far the most likely scenario.
Beechwoodspark wrote: » To me the man who could solve a lot of what was going on that night is the man hanging around the entrance of TDs office. .............
Raconteuse wrote: » It seems like he was involved imo.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » The colleague has said that Trevor did not mention him.
tdf7187 wrote: » They were not the type of prostitute that you'd take home to your mother, put it that way.
yaboya1 wrote: » As opposed to the type of prostitute you would take home to your mother???
DarTipp wrote: » which would indicate that trevor might have known him or had met in bucks, he did look dodgy and him waiting around for over 30mins in really bad weather , and trevor did sound like someone who would report anyone or anything dodgy
Omackeral wrote: » What about the possibility of a drunk driver hitting him? Christmas party season in full swing. No taxis that night so some fool decides to drive into town. Drink driving probably not as taboo 20 years ago as it is now to some people. Bad conditions coupled with poor visibility and a drunk fella maybe walking on the road. Maybe this hypothetical driver had a passenger with them. Possible enough.
Bunny Colvin wrote: » I think the Gardaí were looking at that theory. To me it's the most plausible.
Pheonix10 wrote: » Most likely it's something to shady to do with the man in black waiting outside. Especially as he has never come forward. It seems Trevor may know him though as: He doesn't look shaken when the guy is at the gate with him after following him there. He doesn't tell his work colleague about a guy outside He also walks out to the middle of the path after putting up his umbrella as if to check for anyone left or right of him instead of just going left
snotboogie wrote: » Trevor does not look comfortable at all in the CCTV when interacting with the man outside the bank. Look at the video, Trevor takes an immediate defensive stance when confronted by the man, he grabs the gate with one hand, separating himself from the man in black and hurriedly fumbles with the keys to the gate while continuing to look him even after the man turns away.
Fiftyfilthy wrote: » The men in the video wouldn’t appear immediately to me , to be the usual scum lurking down there . More likely to be in tracksuits and trainers etc than black shoes and trousers So possibly men after being on a night out ? Says in the video that it took td 11 mins to walk a 6 min walk . Could be he was propositioned and declined If a prostitute is out after 4am in weather like that she is desperate to pay someone she owes or for drugs that she needs for the next day The man followed with intention to rob him Just can’t tie in the clothing of the men to a typical pimp etc I’m not for one moment saying td had any involvement with the women in that area but could have been propositioned As will be pointed out , zero evidence that any working girls spoke to him but that doesn’t mean one didn’t. Might not want to come forward to admit working down there etc
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » The men in the video, the ones outside the BOI building are his colleagues That has been well established. The man outside the BOI building, sheltering behind the pillar, remains unidentified.
DarTipp wrote: » 1st MIB to me going by his clothing looks like a security or doorman of a nightclub type
KWAG2019 wrote: » I don’t think speculation about clothing in a 19 year old CCTV tape on a dark wet night from a quite poorly lit area will lead to any breakthroughs. We can convince ourselves of anything looking at it
DarTipp wrote: » well said, what concerns is that his two colleagues are beside the 1st MIB (guy waiting 30mins outside BOI) yet they can't or could not remember anything about him at the time
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » [/b] Probably because he was totally and utterly unremarkable. How many people would a person see or interact with on a December Thursday night out ? Lots Then go and ask them the following Monday afternoon or Tuesday morning to recall those sightings or interactions. Unless the person made an impression then you would be struggling to remember them.
Pheonix10 wrote: » They went to his work and looked in the gate...very strange.
Fiftyfilthy wrote: » Yet it’s fine for you to speculate with your little story earlier?