20Wheel wrote: » Car, river, or house. If he never made it back to his place then one of these is necessary for him to disappear. Its a hole in the premeditation theory, which I otherwise have some confidence in. How do you plan to get someone into a car against their will, in a city center, without 1000 loose ends. A causing death by drink driving charge is plenty reason to keep quiet. And the price of finally coming out with a public confession just keeps going up with each passing day/year.
20Wheel wrote: » I wouldn't rule out premeditation. Mainly because of the strange behaviour of the man in black. From what I remember of the footage, x arrives in good time before Trevors arrival at the corner, where he immediately makes/takes a call. And proceeds to patiently wait some 30 mins without incident. He then makes/takes a call very soon before Trevor arrives at the corner. And steps out seconds before Trevors arrival. His first change in some time. Then as Trevor passes him, he takes a few seconds to check there's no one following, before immediately following Trevor. And having a quick face to face chat. This is all very consistent with identifying and targeting someone. The same man seemingly hasn't identified himself to the gardai. To account for his behaviour that night. Each factor alone can be explained away, but the odds get chipped away at with each one. Until premeditation starts to look like a possibility.
Raconteuse wrote: » .... looking up after Trevor had gone inside. To me it seems like there was an incident in the pub - totally innocuous to Trevor (otherwise he would surely have been shaken or talking about it when he had a chat with his colleague on the night shift) but which bothered some dangerous people, who picked up that he worked in the BoI office down the road.
Augeo wrote: » And they also picked up on the fact he was going to pop into work at 3am ish?
Peter Flynt wrote: » The search for Trevor Deely in Chapelizod a couple of years back tells me that the Gardai (and probably Trevor's family) do not believe he accidentally fell into the canal and ended up at sea and it seems they are more likely to believe that Trevor did become a victim of criminality.
Day Lewin wrote: » Folks, if you want your theories to sound convincing, just please read up on the difference between a canal and a river. The Dodder in spate surges down to the Liffey and thence into Dublin Bay. Fall into the canal at Percy Place and you'll be bobbing against the lock gates. A canal is essentially a series of long narrow ponds, and the Grand Canal is closed to traffic in winter - no gates opened. It's a detail, but a revealing one. Fit the facts please!
pburns wrote: Mmm I remember being caught short one night around the little Mount Street Crescent bridge. I had the bright idea to jump down the bank for a quick pee. Never forget there was this guy in the back of a taxi across the street, I could see the glow of his fag who looked to be watching.
Raconteuse wrote: » Does anyone know if his colleague on the night shift said that Trevor mentioned the man coming right up and talking to him while he was opening the staff gate?
punisher5112 wrote: » Was it ever ruled out as a drug deal gone bad or money was owed..... So sad for the family not knowing. Couldn't even imagine. I do hope it's found out what happened.
Peter Flynt wrote: » There is evidence that Deely's movements were being watched by at least 2 or more people as he left Buck Whaley's to go to BoI around the corner. There is also evidence that he wasn't aware that he seemed in danger as he did not seem perturbed in any way during his conversation with his work colleague in the BoI. I always believe that he felt he was being followed as he seemed to turn around in that last video of him on Haddington Road. After that everything else is just speculation to the general public.
Pheonix10 wrote: » Very strange be went to Alaska alone the week before. The girl he met was never contacted? Odd. Something not right with that.
reg114 wrote: » I have always made the point that if you are walking down the canal on Mespil road from Leeson st and are trying to get to get to Sandymount where Trevor was living at the time, the quickest way to get there , especially on a stormy night is to turn right from Mespil road onto Baggot st and not continue straight down Haddington Road. To go straight down Haddington Road is to take you out of your way and add an extra 5 minutes onto your journey which at all hours on a stormy night makes little sense. I would also question why he was on the Bank side of Haddington road as opposed to the other side. His movements and last known location in my mind do not show a guy who is going straight home.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » This sort of talk got the last thread closed.
Pheonix10 wrote: » Some novel there! Good thing you didn't get carried away haha.
Beechwoodspark wrote: » To me the man who could solve a lot of what was going on that night is the man hanging around the entrance of TDs office.
Omackeral wrote: » What about the possibility of a drunk driver hitting him? Christmas party season in full swing. No taxis that night so some fool decides to drive into town. Drink driving probably not as taboo 20 years ago as it is now to some people. Bad conditions coupled with poor visibility and a drunk fella maybe walking on the road. Maybe this hypothetical driver had a passenger with them. Possible enough.
Beechwoodspark wrote: » To me the man who could solve a lot of what was going on that night is the man hanging around the entrance of TDs office. I still find it odd he never mentioned him to his coworker. Not even, “some auld fella is hanging around the entrance there, who is he I wonder”