tdf7187 wrote: » See, some of these things you're saying are just incorrect. He wasn't followed by a couple and then a girl. You're one of those Youtube bloggers that looks into cases - and that's cool, nothing wrong with that - but get the facts right, dude.
Asitis2019 wrote: » It was the Christmas Party season. people were out and about that night, even though it was bad. More people on the street because of the taxi issue. If there was an altercation, there would be an evidence trail. He was followed by a couple and then a girl, and then god knows who. That is why I think we was bundled into a car.
tdf7187 wrote: » Such naivety.
Asitis2019 wrote: » Very sad case. My thoughts I think he was targeted by a gang that night, and I reckon that it was an opportunistic hit. I would surmise that it started at the gates of BOI asset management - I think he was followed, and bundled into a car shortly after he steps out of the photo frame. Maybe he was offered a lift, but I doubt he would have accepted. My guess is the guy following him was carrying a weapon, and he was forced into the car. I don't know why - maybe they wanted him to launder money, or whatever, but I would say he fought back and was killed in a struggle. If he was killed in a mugging or an altercation in the street, then there would be witnesses, and an evidence trail. That is why I think he was abducted. People have speculated about why he took an indirect route home given the inclement weather. There are two very good possibilities. One is that he was hungry and decided to stop of at a shop or chipper. The second is that he felt he was being followed, and decided to take an indirect route. He was in the wrong place, at the wrong time.
Asitis2019 wrote: » I agree, but I don't think there was a run in. No evidence of that If there was an altercation, somebody would have saw something, and it would have come out by now.
smelly sock wrote: » Id agree. Yeh maybe he went a different route because he wanted chips. But didnt turn down an arguably darker route with less foot fall because he was being followed. This area was a renowned red light district and still is. Whats more likely is he had a run in with some shadey sorts around there.
noodler wrote: » I think the BoI assets management link is mental tbh. They saw a potential employee leave a bank pissed at 4am in the rain on a Friday night and made a hopeful punt he'd somehow be able to be coerced into doing their bidding when he's back in work on Monday morning? I doubt his place of work had anything to do with this. God I wish he'd fallen asleep at his desk.
chicorytip wrote: » Street prostitution in Dublin had died out completely by the year 2000 in the aftermath of Maire Geoghan Quinn's draconian legislation penalising the offence. Seems she regarded Homosexuals as cool but Hookers as filth.
dubstarr wrote: » Was the Bank he worked at,on his way home from where he was that night
KWAG2019 wrote: » I assumed that. Just offering that link for thought.
tdf7187 wrote: » Cool the jets, pal. I'm not a cop.
KWAG2019 wrote: » I think most adults here would know this already. There is a problem if police have issued a claim of significant witness and cannot back it up. They lose credibility. If one was of a mind to then Page 10 of the following offers some food for thought:https://www.garda.ie/en/about-us/publications/policy-documents/code-of-ethics-english-1-5-18.pdf
tdf7187 wrote: » Ok, let me make a few points, and I don't mean to be offensive. (1) Not everything in the media is true. (2) Cops use media sources to get info out, sometimes for ethically and procedurally valid reasons, sometimes for corrupt reasons. (3) It is quite right, in my view, that cops sometimes use media to put bait out. Think of it as a fisherman that uses different types of bait to nab a big fish. That's the nature of the beast. (4) Cops do not always agree on cases, in a detective team there will be internal debate and disagreement. I have direct knowledge of cases like that, not this specific case. I'm talking about corrupt politicians and things of that nature, some of 'em household names, kapiche? (5) Who precisely - and I'm intrigued by this - would get the papers 'in big trouble' for 'making such stuff up'? (6) I don't have inside knowledge on this case, and if I did I wouldn't put it on here, but really and truly, at the age of 46, welcome to the really real world. As I said, no personal offence intended.
tdf7187 wrote: » Yeah. Wasn't the most direct route as the crow flies, but wasn't far off it. Of course the CCTV footage that has been released may only be portion of what the cops have.
Beechwoodspark wrote: » Maybe the weather wasn’t as bad as forecast ? TD called into his office before embarking home. He collected an umbrella.
Beechwoodspark wrote: » I’m only going on the Irish times report which include the weather forecast for that night
smelly sock wrote: » Ye know ill challenge this. I remember the night and it was cold and wet. Nothing out of the ordinary though. Some posters and media would have you believe it was a hurricane which it wasnt. Anyway neither here nor there i suppose.
suicide_circus wrote: » random murder is rare. very rare. if as is being suggested, Trevor fell foul of a criminal gang, its difficult to avoid the idea that he was having some type of interaction with them. the area was notorious for prostitution and that trade goes hand in hand with orgabised crime, drugs etc.
NoeldeBournaix wrote: » This is an episode of 'O'Gorman's People' from 1999 for anyone who would like to know a bit more about the area around that time. Its based around the Spar shop on Baggot Street which he says was 24hr, and talks to various characters.https://youtu.be/z_h_lmYprI4
Beechwoodspark wrote: » Was a pretty rough night weather wise. Lashing Rain and windy
starbaby2003 wrote: » I’m not sure he would have taken one. It’s not a particularly long walk. I used to live there and would rarely get a taxi home. This was when you would be queuing 60 mins plus for a taxi, longer than the walk home.