Raconteuse wrote: » Oh right, thought they were Crumlin/Walkinstown.
tdf7187 wrote: » Indeed. I never personally had any trouble but was certainly asked 'lookin for business love?' on plenty of occasions. Now that I think of it the mate I was on the session with that time we rounded the night off with kebabs was mugged on his way home from work another time.
Beechwoodspark wrote: » Bit strange this is reported all of a sudden coinciding around the time of year of his disappearance. I’d be cautious on this.
Beechwoodspark wrote: » Ok. Interesting. I didn’t realise that area was like that then. Would they and their minders have been “at work” on a wet windy night in early December at 3/4am?
seamus wrote: » That said, anniversaries also tend to focus the mind. Someone who knows something might be able to push it to the back of their mind for the rest of the year, but the anniversary brings it back, and sometimes people just crack and come forward.
begbysback wrote: » There’s a type of prostitute you would take home to your mother?
tdf7187 wrote: » Figure of speech. But let's move on from that rather facetious comment of mine, we don't want another of these threads locked.
Dodge wrote: » To be clear there is no figure of speech relating to bringing hookers back to your mother
tdf7187 wrote: » I'll tell you guys something else, and this only just occured to me. I myself worked in banking at the time Trevor disappeared, not for BOI but another institution, and due to the nature of my role I had professional reasons to have contacts with the CAB. And I recall distinctly being made aware due to those contacts that a premises on Leeson Street a few doors up from the pub the Leeson Lounge which traded as a B&B was in reality a knocking shop. I am just making the point that that whole area had a kind of shabby genteel aspect to it, and while largely wealthy and respectable on the surface there was a lot of seediness going on underneath. Note, I am not trying to imply Trevor frequented such establishments, there is no evidence for that, I am just saying I do give credence to the theory that he had a chance encounter with a criminal which ended badly. And more importantly, apparently the AGS also do. I long assumed that he had accidentally fallen into the canal and drowned, but the other theory is just as plausible at this point.
EmmetSpiceland wrote: » What’s bothered me since the “cleaned up” footage was released is that they never mentioned how a man waited 30-40 minutes until Trevor Deely passes by and then he follows him around to the gate. All that was said was that he spoke with someone. Even before that new footage they had the original of that guy looking in through the gate. Another bank worker goes in at this time while another waits for him. Just seemed like a lot of detail that was left out if they were trying to “jog” memories. I remember that night because of the taxi strike and the fact I had to get a lift home from the boyfriend of a colleague I was “seeing” at the time. I wasn’t near that area of town but someone else might remember something strange if they were provided with a full description of what was known. It was also stated at the time that Trevor Deely was supposed to meet a man and woman when he left the office but that wasn’t mentioned again. Also, out of curiosity, does anyone know why the footage of the “person of interest” following Trevor on the Baggot St footage is never shown at normal speed, it’s always shown “sped up”? Would be great if this case was finally solved.
20Wheel wrote: » Know of any on Haddington Rd?
farmchoice wrote: » going off topic here but there was a well known knocking shop on baggot st, the fella who ran it was a real wide boy, but not a dangerous type, you would see him in the tesco there on baggot st going around with trolly pilled high with toilet paper, wet wipes etc with a couple of bedraggled whores trailing along behind him he was blatant about it and got done afterwards and was in the papers. the first generation of lap dancing joints on lesson st were rough and ready and were little more than knocking shops, the door staff were proper hard men too. there was one we used to frequent i cant recall the name now, not angels, it was up the street a bit further i think, it was some craic but i saw a good few ''patrons'' getting a few fairly serious clips off the door men as they were escorted off the premises.
Stevieluvsye wrote: » Must have been strings. They were the only two on Leeson street
Raconteuse wrote: » Probably just the way the security camera was. I don't see why there are grounds for believing that the guy behind him by the Haddington Road ATM was following him. And his build is totally different to the guy who was waiting at the bank gate for half an hour, whom I think must have been following him.
farmchoice wrote: » https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/sex-industry-links-with-russian-mafia-prompted-lap-dance-raids-26232203.html these were the charming people who ran it.
seamus wrote: » Tbh, I think the "unfortunate encounter with the wrong people" theory has been around pretty as long as he's been missing. Murder isn't a common or throwaway thing, even in gangland circles. When something happens, they do talk about it amongst themselves, they spread gossip and rumours. This comes back to the Gardai, so they get some kind of picture of what's happened. The hard part is turning gossip into statements.
KWAG2019 wrote: » I'm always very cautious about Gardai or any police saying "we know who did it but can't / have yet to prove it." Like it or not the decision about guilt rests with courts. It can be too easy for the claim to be made and it elevates police to a role they don't have and shouldn't have.
KWAG2019 wrote: » I'm always very cautious about Gardai or any police saying "we know who did it but can't / have yet to prove it." Like it or not the decision about guilt rests with courts. It can be too easy for the claim to be made and it elevates police to a role they don't have and shouldn't have. That said, I believe this news is more to do with the gardai timing this for an anniversary to see will it knock anything else out of the tree. Wait and see. The brilliant initiative of DNA checking with unidentified bodies in Wales / Scotland can't be praised enough. I'd go so far as to say that in missing persons' cases of say over a year that DNA samples from closest relatives should be mandatory. I can see no good reason for a refusal; I can see emotional ones but those have to play second fiddle to the reality of improving chances of closing a case, establishing if remains can indicate foul play etc and using scarce police resources effectively. I don't know if an older thread was closed at anyone's request. It would be unusual in the wider world if we all got to stop discussion of things we found uncomfortable.
Berserker5 wrote: » They'd likely have information if it was him, wasn't a BIL a witness in the case