Elmer Blooker wrote: » I've noticed that RTE insists in saying the 'so called' Islamic State. Some definitions of 'so called' after a search: So it seems RTE think that IS may not really exist?
Spanish Eyes wrote: » I wonder why she was arrested on arrival in Dublin on suspicion of terrorism offences, any ideas? Terrorism in ROI? I thought I read somewhere that some Act or other included foreign terrorism as a crime by an Irish resident/citizen. Not sure though.
Tangatagamadda Chaddabinga Bonga Bungo wrote: She has been arrested. And evidence has been gathered on her since 2012. There is a fair enough chance she will be going to prison.
tuxy wrote: » Even with much stricter laws it's unclear if the Garda or DPP can obtain evidences outside of the EU and close allies.
Tangatagamadda Chaddabinga Bonga Bungo wrote: » She has been arrested. And evidence has been gathered on her since 2012. There is a fair enough chance she will be going to prison.
lawrencesummers wrote: » And if they obtain evidence of a crime in another country, she can’t be tried for that here.
tayto lover wrote: » She’ll be free tomorrow.
jmreire wrote: » While isis exists as a terrorist group...they have never been recognised as a "State". Hence the "So Called" . RTE are correct.
bubblypop wrote: » You can be arrested under section 30 of the offences against the state act, for a number of offences, I would be interested myself in the offence for which she was arrested. The offence, here, is being a member of an unlawful organisation. That does not cover terrorist organisations outside the state. There are in fact only 2 unlawful organisations in Ireland.
screamer wrote: » Is it confirmed that the child she has with her is actually her child? Wasn’t born here, nor registered here. wonder if there was even a registration of birth over there..... yet it’s an Irish citizen????
Spanish Eyes wrote: » What about the Criminal Justice (Terrorist Offences) Act 2005? A CAB like SI was signed to amend this Act to cover situations like LS in March this year.
bubblypop wrote: » There is no offence in this country of being a member of a terrorist organization in another country.
Field east wrote: » Why has the government not incorporated the proverbial paragraph into Irish law as soon as the Lisa Smith saga Wes initially known about. Or even b4 that when it was known that some Irish and other citizens living here were helping out the ISIS cause Gov should be proactive rather than being reactive
Sour Lemonz wrote: » Ireland has now set a potentially dangerous precedent by this move, other countries will now be told to take back a lot of radicalized Isis scum, which will reintroduce these dangerous people back into society to strike out again. Honestly they should all have been left there to face justice from the locals who the hurt, persecuted and killed. It was very convenient for her to dismiss her citizenship when it suited to enable (if proven not participated) in Isis agenda and now they were put down hard wishes to come back.
Yurt! wrote: » Flase. Extraterritorial jurisdiction has been a feature of Irish law for quite a long time...https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterritorial_jurisdiction_in_Irish_law#:~:targetText=The%20state%20of%20Ireland%20asserts,1861%2C%20as%20adapted%20in%201973.P
lawrencesummers wrote: » By feature you mean it’s there in theory but never used in practice?
Sour Lemonz wrote: » Ireland has now set a potentially dangerous precedent by this move, other countries will now be told to take back a lot of radicalized Isis scum, which will reintroduce these dangerous people back into society to strike out again. Honestly they should all have been left there to face justice from the locals who the hurt, persecuted and killed.
Eric Cartman wrote: » I doubt she will, but in a decent country she would be locked up forever or face the death penalty.
bubblypop wrote: » Well, only if the decent country could actually prove she committed an offence