Richard Hillman wrote: » I think you take your freedom for granted.
lawrencesummers wrote: » So she joined a terrorist organisation, thousands of Irish have done that.
lawrencesummers wrote: » I’ve not been paying a lot of attention to this, but what has she actually done wrong, other than marry someone unsavory and move to a kip Of a place? Is there actually some evidence that she has been involved in crimes other than posts on the internet?
bubblypop wrote: » Well, this is it isn't it. We don't know i suppose how involved she was. But if all she did was marry an Isis fighter, then there should be a lot of Irish women arrested over the years! At the end of the day, ahe is not going to be charged with anything, I'm surprised they even arrested her, given the lack of evidence of any crime.
Tea drinker wrote: » And they faced prison or been shot. Lisa will go be spending what, about 150K of the taxpayers money per year? She probably burned thru over a million this year with the Army ranger wing dossing around there for months, plus dept foreign affairs time, politicians time spent on this issue, Garda time, Tusla time etc etc. It's not like we have any need for money, as one of the most indebted nations in the world sure we are fooked anyway. No bleating about homelessness or sick kids dying though... you get Lisa instead.
Yurt! wrote: » Here's hoping a file had been built up on her activities since she was detained in Syria. Weren't AGS in and out of the region building a picture of what she was up to?
bubblypop wrote: » Sure what activities could she have been doing since being detained?
Tea drinker wrote: » She probably burned thru over a million this year with the Army ranger wing dossing around there for months
The gray bird wrote: » She's trained by our army in using weapons theres no doubt she was training isis fighters how to use them over there
Sam Quentin wrote: » Close but no cigar,.it was actually today at 10:30am ohhh and at Dublin airport. Your Welcome.. But if it's of any consolation::your post was the first of hundreds of fake news posts in this thread
Yurt! wrote: » I think they were interviewing other detainees with regard to her activities over the past few years, at least that's what an article I read suggested. And she was probably interviewed by other nation's security forces also. If the BBC were talking to her, you can take it that more serious actors were as well.
Ignacio Stocky Rosewood wrote: » I did try and tell them that it was a Defence Forces charter flight as part of the UNIFIL rotation but I was shouted down.
Dravokivich wrote: » I thought engaging with members of terrorist organisations was a crime here?
elperello wrote: » Forcible adoption blighted this country for many years. We are still trying to deal with the human misery it caused. We are not going back there.
lawrencesummers wrote: » No they didn’t. There are still Irish people joining the British army, and the last time I check being married to a terrorist isn’t illegal. Is there actually any evidence of a crime or are the government having her arrested just to be seen to be doing it?
jmreire wrote: » Except that her relatives have already said that they will take care of the child...there is no talk of adoption or taken into care etc. At the end of the day, the law is the law, she is Lisa's Baby, so for sure she will have a say in the matter. Bearing in mind that as the Law stands. Lisa is innocent until proven guilty...and proving her guilty, that's going to be some task for the state. Because what ever she may have done abroad, she has not done anything wrong here in Ireland. It's quite conceivable that next week, she will be free as a bird, and reunited with her Child
cfuserkildare wrote: » We all know that she will be out on the street in a few weeks due to lack of evidence against her.
lawrencesummers wrote: » So therefore she did nothing illegal, but plenty wrong.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Sounds a bit like diminished responsibility to me. So either there will be no evidence of terrorism, or if there is, the DR defence may be claimed. Just my view of course.
bubblypop wrote: » She will be out in 24 hours due to no evidence, I would imagine
inappropriately named supposed alleged presumed
Elmer Blooker wrote: » I've noticed that RTE insists in saying the 'so called' Islamic State. Some definitions of 'so called' after a search: So it seems RTE think that IS may not really exist?
bubblypop wrote: » There is no offence in this country of being a member of a terrorist organization in another country.