Brian? wrote: » Themselves? I thought you were talking about Leo specifically. But ok, that's one agenda. What other agendas?
biko wrote: » Did you just assume the child's gender?
ReginaldSmythV wrote: » Getting themselves a cushy well paid EU job.
Calhoun wrote: » I wonder where they will put her, her parents house could be unsafe due to her presence but also the comments from her father. I don't envy the job to relocate her. I would like to know the plan to protect her child.
LorelaiG wrote: » She. Not it.
Irishmale0399 wrote: » More interesting would be to know why she was in a position to be radicalised and who did it, what triggered it??
biko wrote: » The child could be set up for adoption. That way the child will grow up in a normal Irish household with parents that have no sense of its history. It will grow up normally and not prepped by it's mother to wage jihad And Lisa cannot use it to play the system and the bleeding hearts.
rgossip30 wrote: » A little reminder of her past and what officials are dealing with !!https://www.thesun.ie/news/4818698/lisa-smith-married-four-times-leaving-jihad-syria/
Odyssey 2005 wrote: » They can,but she has a passport now. In all the times I've been asked for mine in the ports in France, the officer just gave a cursory glance at it. I've never been stopped in the uk ports,so she does have free access to Europe
Boggles wrote: » Has she? More than likely a temporary passport issued by the embassy.
Odyssey 2005 wrote: » If this knut didnt loose her citizenship...nobody can
elperello wrote: » Forcible adoption blighted this country for many years. We are still trying to deal with the human misery it caused. We are not going back there.
Odyssey 2005 wrote: » They can,but she has a passport now.
Brian? wrote: » What agendas?
Boggles wrote: » No there isn't, you can't actually name any so stop with your usual nonsense. The 2 options are little Justin Cosplay Nazi or Full Blown Simpleton Gemma. Anyone that votes for them should have their citizenship revoked.
The_Kew_Tour wrote: » Oh, what happened to everyone else?:rolleyes:
The_Kew_Tour wrote: » Nobody gives a **** about those 2 as Election Day will tell.
ricero wrote: » Child could grow up and continue on her mother and fathers work. Not worth the risk.
Yurt! wrote: » EU nationals can be refused entry to another EU country on public order, public health or public security grounds. This right of member nations to refuse entry is strictly interpreted, but I'd imagine that Lisa given her history could find herself on a blacklist and won't be holidaying in Benidorm quite as freely as you'd imagine. This is another reason why the Irish authorities will be under pressure to secure a conviction. A lot of misinformation on this thread.
elperello wrote: » You are correct about our legislation deficit with regard to handling cases like this. The Government should press ahead with the correct legislation without any further delay. However such legislation could not be applied to the LS case.
tuxy wrote: » Leo must really want a nice job in the EU. He has done everything perfectly under international law, this is something I'm happy about. But he does not care about Irish citizens and has not ensured there is adequate legislation in place for cases like this.
Brian? wrote: » It’s pretty simple, he has no grá for them at all. But the Irish government are obligated to do certain things, including admitting their own citizens. I’ve zero time for ISIS, but we live in a society of laws. You can’t decide to break the law without punishment and the government of the day shouldn’t be able to either.
Beechwoodspark wrote: » if he doesn’t win the next election he’s on the next plane to Brussels for a cushy number over there. It’s quite shocking to see him and others in govt actively putting other agendas over the Irish national interest.