Spanish Eyes wrote: » She should not be courted by MSM or be on the LLS or write a book, or whatever. Odious woman. I'd be happy enough for her to get home, but not make any money out of it all. Should have been a condition for her repatriation IMV. But we love everyone don't we.
tuxy wrote: » If she comes on a commercial ............, there is no risk to passengers.
Limpy wrote: » Its occupied yes. Under international law the Syrian borders have not changed. So these terrorists and there supporters should be tried in the country they committed offences.
Richard Hillman wrote: » Are Turkish Airlines the only carrier that fly from Istanbul to Dublin directly? You'd be wanting a refund or an alternative flight if you had to get on a plane with a member of ISIS. The airline should be insisting that she be handcuffed.
Limpy wrote: » The only people wanting these terrorists to come home are the paid shills. Why is that?
Limpy wrote: » ISIS went From the worse thing since AQ to being rebel's who need our help to get home. Let's hug them and they will forgot about all the war crimes they commited.
Limpy wrote: » Gimme a break, anyone who wants them to come home should just move over to northern Syria and enjoy the hospitality. Good riddance.
Limpy wrote: » The only people wanting these terrorists to come home are the paid shills.
tuxy wrote: » The Syrian state do not have control of vast parts of their own country, the parts Lisa was in included. How on earth do you propose that they could enforce Syrian law?
Limpy wrote: » The Western countries were doing there best to bring all these "asset's" home. She should have been subjected to the law of the Syrian state and handed over to the Syrian government for interrogation and trial for terrorism offences ect.
Yurt! wrote: » Upon her return, I think there should be a reality TV show starring Lisa of the Levant, Margret Cash, John Connors, Ian O'Doherty, yerman from Pavee Point, The Nordie Peruvian drug mule woman, Gemma O'Doherty, Paul Murphy and perhaps George Hook. Their job is to construct a fully functioning harmonious micro-society with nothing but their wits and a high-speed fibre optic internet connection provided under the National Broadband Scheme. It should be presented by Marty Whelan and Blindboy - and at the end of each week, viewers vote to send the losing contestant to a sit-down with Fintan O'Toole who will help them contextualize the week's goings on within the current historical epoch and national milieu. The winner gets a 4eva home and mid-morning slot on national radio. It would be sure fire winner with After Hours viewers.
elperello wrote: » Reported on RTE now that return will be in a few days. Time to face up to reality and stop propounding fantasy ideas about foisting our problem onto another country.
biko wrote: » When she comes back she will become a rallying point for other extremists.
Deleted User wrote: » No need for deportation. Revoke her citizenship and exile her. Let her find her own place in the world.. since it's obviously not Ireland. There's quite a few countries out there with a majority Muslim population where she would be better suited to live in, and they can decide to deny/accept her based on her history.
Deleted User wrote: » The idea of deportation is awkward because it's asking another country to take responsibility for her, and requires us to nominate such a country. Let her do that, as long as it's not Ireland.
unkel wrote: » Why the hell was a lot of effort and tax payers money used to bring a foreign child (and her terrorist Irish mother, who no doubt has committed horrible crimes) to Ireland? Makes no sense to me at all. The Dutch government was challenged in court about their refusal to bring similar people "home", they won. They won't have to do anything. Let that jihad scum rot in hell is what I say. Hope they take her child off her and let her be adopted by normal caring and loving people, wherever in the world. Give her love and educate her about her evil mother.
suicide_circus wrote: » is it legal to make someone stateless?
BalcombeSt4 wrote: » I understand what you mean, I suppose that is not impossible & it possibly could happen but I can't of any historical case were it has happened. Of course politicians tells lies all the time to get themselves elected to positions of power. But I don't think the electorate would be that stupid to elect to power a political party who's speeches are full a great inspiring democratic rhetoric but are secretly plotting the end of democracy & the setting up of a terror police state. The closet example I can think of is the November 1932 German elections were the Nazi's won the most sets but not a majority & formed a coalition government with the Conservatives & the Nazi's passed the Enabling Act which suspened civil liberties & later carried out the Night of the Long Knifes to consolidate their power, that was the end of Democracy. But the Nazis never talked about how much they loved Democracy, they were very open about their disdain for Democracy, Hitler wrote things in Mein Kampf like "Democracy will eventually lead Marxism", and other strange statements which expressed his disdain for any sort of Democratic rule. I think something like a Nazi type party taking power could, I mean it has happened again inn South & Central America, usually with the backing of the US. A Fascistc President was voted into power in Brazil a few months ago, claiming the last brutal Military Junta in Brazil was too soft and that it should have killed about another 30,000 people. There's Fascist parties all over Europe some with very large followings, France had a very close call. But all these people are clear what their intentions are about before they come to power, I don't see how a party that truely believed in Democratic principles could end Democracy.
