Granny15 wrote: » Deegan isn't as good technically as Doris. I can't remember the last ruck he hit straight on with a shoulder. Most of the clearouts he does are hit in side-on forearm/bicep wrap/hit. How long does it take a young player to learn hit straight on and go through the gate and not hit sideways leading with the side of your torso. It's bad technical coaching he has learnt. I would also say his handling leaves a lot to be desired and he can be lazy at times waiting out on the wing for a ball down the tramlines. In a game like Lyon you aren't going to get that and the forwards need all the help they can get in tight exchanges. He has a tendancy to MIA in these exchanges. Finally, his ball handling skills are poor. I can't remember how many times he has knocked on or fumbled a pass to him. A guy of his athletic ability should be able to pick up a ball off his bootlaces if he gets a bad pass. I put it down to mentality - confidence or laziness.
Interested Observer wrote: » This post is just about the biggest crock of **** to be quite honest. On him going MIA - the match against Lyon was a largely forward dominated defensive effort and he made the second most tackles in the game after VdF. How did he manage that if he was hanging out on the wing? And his ball handling skills are poor? This is one of those things I read where I am just baffled.
Niallof9 wrote: » People forgetting O'Sullivan as well. A serious talent but it matters not, CJ on his central contract and different standards due to said status won't be dropped for any of these lads.
Shefwedfan wrote: » Did I ask for "Joe is great".....let's have a quick look at your first post The tone of the post is Heaslip is been critical of Joe.....No mention of Heaslip saying Joe is one of best coach's he has worked under.....
aloooof wrote: » You've been given 2 examples of lads on central contracts who were dropped / not-selected and you still persist with this nonsense. It's just not true.
Niallof9 wrote: » I'm not saying he's undroppable.
Niallof9 wrote: » CJ on his central contract and different standards due to said status won't be dropped
Niallof9 wrote: » Doris, Deegan, JOS have to "prove" themselves, yet how do they do that when only one lad, the incumbent is on 500k.
Squidgy Black wrote: » So we've gone from NIQ players holding young lads back to now it being centrally contracted players holding them back.
Niallof9 wrote: » it protects him somewhat. its nonsense to suggest otherwise. I'm not saying he's undroppable. But it gives him exalted status. Doris, Deegan, JOS have to "prove" themselves, yet how do they do that when only one lad, the incumbent is on 500k and centralyl contracted, thereby granting him better sponsorship access etc. I mean why would they only have 11 deals if this wasn't the case. we are seeing the same with Aki now. Toner was explained by Joe and was injured/not good enough. Jack was in limbo because of the resurgence of Healy and the rareness of his position. anyhoo lets not go there. Stander should be at 6 imo.
aloooof wrote: » And meanwhile we haven't even had an Andy Farrell squad announcement yet.
AbusesToilets wrote: » I don't want to see Stander start until he learns how to do something other than run directly into the nearest defender. He offers little to nothing as an international 8 at the moment. His lack of passing ability is a huge deficiency and has been persistent for years. Conan is streets ahead of him in terms of attacking ability and ball skills, and the newer players coming through, such as Deegan and Doris, are likely better again.
Deleted User wrote: » Yes let's not go there. Stop bringing it up. It's complete nonsense that a centrally contracted player has some kind of clause that gets him picked more than others. You admitted yourself in the past that it's highly unlikely. Stop bringing it up ffs
Niallof9 wrote: » Look yeah statistically CJ is in the top 3 eights in World Rugby. There isn't much problem there at all - Points 5 Tries 1 Metres 284 Runs 171 Defenders Beaten 10 Clean Breaks 1 Passes 47 Try Assists 5 Tackles 129 Tackles Missed 10 Turnovers Won 5 Turnovers Conceded 14 Discipline Penalties Conceded7 Yellow Cards0 Red Cards0 We have question marks at 9, 2 , back 3 basically. Everything else is just fluff. Ruddock isn't better than POM and Josh is holding Leavy's jersey warm but playing really well. I don't think there is any other real change coming. I'd be happy with Kelleher getting game time, Larmour trusted and Conway. A new 9 given a chance
leakyboots wrote: » Meant to say, CJ isn't a bad shout for captain. Would think it'll one of him, James Ryan (think he'd be my pick, although maybe another couple of years might be better), Sexton and POM.
Shefwedfan wrote: » You want to pick on form and then say Ruddock not much better to POM who is in awful form now for over 12 months. Ruddock is one of the form players in Ireland. Leavy wont be back this season, even if he is he won't be in an Ireland jersey.
leakyboots wrote: » When are Lowe/JGP/Tyler qualified?
leakyboots wrote: » Maybe it's just me but I think some Leinster fans overrate Ruddock, he's been around the Ireland team for almost a decade now and has never really nailed a spot down. I find him pretty average at international level