Pmacv1 wrote: » Nope, what I'm saying is that in the last 50 years, the 5 subjects I've outlined as most beneficial, have contributed much more than philosophy has in the past 50 years, and will most likely continue to do so. Anybody can have a mediocre career in any field.
LirW wrote: » ESKIMOS DO NOT EXIST!
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » Watch the right go for geography and environmental science next.
Raconteuse wrote: » I was talking about your post where you said take out the first five and you get a population only voting Trump. That needs more thinking through.
Better Than Christ wrote: » So if a person completes your average computer science degree, and goes on to have a good career in their chosen field, albeit one which doesn't make any significant contribution to any improvements to people's lives, was their decision to pursue that degree a waste of time? When I did philosophy, I noticed that a significant number of medical students chose certain moral philosophy modules as electives. Do you think they were wasting their time?
Pmacv1 wrote: » Nope I'm referring to research and achievements which have improved our lives beyond the wildest imaginations of those living 50 years ago, and continue to improve constantly.
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » Without philosophy you wouldn't have democracy at all.
LirW wrote: » While I believe that just about every degree has its right to exist and are useful for society in one way or another, there's one I'd like to nominate as worst contender: Geography. Not because it's boring or wishy-washy, but I believe that the overall topics are covered better by Google maps and other academic disciplines.
Raconteuse wrote: » Wha?!
Pmacv1 wrote: » Teachings a post-grad qualification, which is why I omitted it, but I agree fundamentally.
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » Good list. I totally agree. except for one thing. Take out the first five and you get a population that votes for trump every single time ...and we all die.
glack wrote: » Not sure how any of your most useful 5 would get there with a few people with education degrees. Even doctors needed teachers...
Pmacv1 wrote: » Great, it's not overly useful now though is it? Don't get me wrong, it's fascinating to study, but only in very exceptional cases does it now provide any value.
Twister2 wrote: » I would put maths up there but you need higher than basic degree
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » Without philosophy ..you wouldn't have science at all. And if you had studied history you would know that. In fact science was once called 'natural philosophy'.
Better Than Christ wrote: » I presume you're referring to monetary value. Intellectual value not being worth anything in your tiny, narrow little mind.
Pawwed Rig wrote: » Surprised that computer science is so high on the list. Is that your qualification OP? I think theology/philosophy would be interesting to do but your back to interesting v useful. I would put economics in there somewhere on the useful side. Anthropology could go in on the useless side