[Deleted User] wrote: » Is there any shot of Karren Brady without her grimacing? Becoming a tedious eyesore.
seligehgit wrote: » The award for the most atrocious joke of all time goes to Lord Sugar and he's had a few candidates. Asteroids aren't those what you get for sitting around too long!
siblers wrote: » They got more of an adrenaline rush from the nightmare one due to the use of spray etc, the loop one had the riders being thrown all over the place, their glasses kept falling off which made the experience a bit rubbish. I didn't get the impression thar many of the crowd enjoyed the experience , whereas most did seem to enjoy the nightmare one As for the brand, there was probably more potential with the nightmare one with the reverse drop
Exclamation Marc wrote: » Lottie is insufferable. Cant see her going the whole way.
Mantis Toboggan wrote: » Are herself and Lewis still hooking up or has that ended in tears?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Well thats partly while I'm calling shenanigans. Its not about designing a roller coaster its about creating a brand, and the brand of the Final Loop looked way better. Roller coasters aren't meant to be comfortable. People are going for the adrenaline rush. The speed, the sensations and the next best thing. There is a roller coaster in the UK with 14 loops, and there are people who would want to go on the one with 15. Concern was raised by the "expert" that 0-60 in just over a second would be dangerous, but theres one in Ohio that gets 0-190kph(so 114 miles an hour) in just under 4 seconds. It really feels to me, that they were going to fail that task no-matter what. Well I've given up on You're Fired. And this is an example of why. Don't bring on a physicist to talk about a brand task, bring on a brand expert. Also, is that fact, or did he do it to get a laugh?
siblers wrote: » If you look at the crowd reactions when using the rollercoasters, the crowd looked way more excited in the nightmate one, the effects worked better and got a much better reception. The loop one, the crowd were being thrown all over the place, it looked fairly uncomfortable so not too surprised with the result. The nightmare one looked **** but had probably better potential
it looked fairly uncomfortable so not too surprised with the result.
They had a guy on You're Fired suggesting that so many loops and their world record speed would actually be a death trap.
LordBasil wrote: » I don't agree with that. I remember that Australian Guy who won a few years ago (I think his name Mark Wright, not to be confused with the TOWIE star) was quite arrogant and unlikeable at least imo.
Exclamation Marc wrote: » Most of the winners in recent years have been generally likeable people. The candidates in each year who were disliked or deeply unpopular always fall short.
siblers wrote: » If you look at the crowd reactions when using the rollercoasters, the crowd looked way more excited in the nightmate one, the effects worked better and got a much better reception. The loop one, the crowd were being thrown all over the place, it looked fairly uncomfortable so not too surprised with the result. The loop one looked **** but had probably better potential
seligehgit wrote: » Shocked with the verdict although the originality of the ride in reverse won it for them.
everlast75 wrote: » i genuinely don't like her. I think she is too abrasive and frankly, too big for her boots. However, she was spot on about oul Tommy, me ould geezer. He would have been happy to do that task all by himself which is not the aim of the process. She did allow him leeway - 75% sounded about right. She even complimented him for various ideas. However, when she wanted to do one thing, a thing her captain told her to do, he flipped out like a little toddler having a tantrum. She is academically clever, and has good business acumen. She is just immature. When she learns how to interact with people better, she will be a very good business person.
Mantis Toboggan wrote: » Crazy that's she's only 19. When I was that age I spent most of the time either drunk or hungover. I can see her going far in this competition.
seligehgit wrote: » Very impressed with Thomas this week. Ryan Mark and his partner in crime performed very poor. Shocked with the verdict although the originality of the ride in reverse won it for them.
castletownman wrote: » Ryan Mark with a couple of innuendo remarks towards Lewis, but if it was a straight man doing the same towards one of the women, there would be a furore.
Still Ill wrote: » Did she not project manage her team to over a million in sales the other week though?
castletownman wrote: » A lamb. Living off winging it in Week 1, that she even admitted to in the boardroom.