This thread reminded me of a few instances in the last couple of weeks which have me concerned so i wanted to see if anyone was having the same experience/problem.
I applied for a substitution a few months back. After waiting months i finally got it, but part of the demands of the new FO was that i surrender my current license so when the substitution goes through i only have possession of the new/subbed license for the new firearm.
At the time i was asked for it i protested, vigorously, citing the number of problems such a demand would create not least of which was if the sub was refused by the Super (as the fO only processes the application) then i have no license for the firearm
still in my possession.
This week i was contacted by a few lads with similar problems and one with the exact problem i had and as predicted he is now having the exact issue(s) i predicted. He went for a sub, was rang and told it won't be done (it was only the FO not the Super so i told him to push it, but he didn't want the hassle), and that he would have to submit a new application.
The problem now is, he was forced to surrender his current license so has no license for the firearm in his possession.
When this happened to me i pointed out to my FO how even the Commissioner's guidelines state:
It should be noted that the original firearm certificate will cease to be in force but should only be destroyed by the holder following receipt of the newly amended firearm certificate carrying the details of the new firearm.
I told him he has three options:
- Contact the FO and demand his license back
- Contact the FO and demand a newly printed license
- contact the Super to complain about this new "rule" and demand his license back.
I told him i would write to support him with my experience of this (my sub went through so although i had no license for nearly three months i eventually got one.
Anyone else getting asked for this?