wawaman wrote: » Im heading over this weekend for the Packers game. I hope they will let my "Shurmur Out" banner thru customs
KrustyUCC wrote: » I know in the past Mara and co have been patient but it's hard to make any argument for keeping Shurmur on I fear you will need plenty of beer to get through that game esp as the Packers need the win and are just better than us Rodgers will have a field day
boccy23 wrote: » I wonder could we get Chase Young? Could be the Defensive game changer with a new HC that we need. We are still deficient in talent, but we're not at the bottom of the rebuild curve either. The D needs work and the O-line is still below average.
KrustyUCC wrote: » Another frustrating game that we def could have won Poor teams find ways to lose and we are good at it 2 missed FG for us and a FG for them just before HT sapped our confidence That punt situation at the end was horrific and doesn't show Shurmur in a good light Only plus is that we are now into the second pick at the moment
KrustyUCC wrote: Surely there is no way Shurmur survives this year?
KrustyUCC wrote: » Well that was another crap performance So many mistakes and mess ups Jones turnovers def becoming a worry at this stage Baker looks lost. He even admitted after the game he doesn't know the play book well enough Rest of season all about getting as high a draft pick as possible Even though we will prob get some meaningless wins to mess that up
Knex. wrote: » I thought I read that he was 7th? Either since he joined the league, or this year. Spose for where he was taken you would still expect more, so definitely agree that he's been a relative disappointment. Interesting that you say it may be a motivation thing too. Not a great thing to hear, but from a Giants perspective it could mean that there's more of a chance that the talent is there to actually unlock. We'll see anyway!
phatkev wrote: » This a massive misconception, when you look at the rate at which interior d lineman are double teamed he's way down the list. I think motivation was definitely an issue for him so maybe a change up might do him good
boccy23 wrote: » All true. Only thing is our 3rd round pick for the Jets will be around late 60s whereas the comp pick will be around pick 100. The trade itself is strange without a deal. With a mid tier deal, I think it’s worth the gamble. He was a no-miss player coming out of college. So a change of scenery could work. If BB did this deal for the Pats, we’d all say oh “typical Patriots way”.
Knex. wrote: » I'm a fan of getting the depth on that line, though. He's at least an average player and he's constantly double teamed on that Jets side. Will hold judgement until we see how things pan out between now and next offseason. We'll get a comp 3rd for Collins I think, so we'll still have a 3rd round pick.
KrustyUCC wrote: » Unless Getty can get him signed long term we got fleeced High 3rd rounder plus a possible 4th