Roger_007 wrote: » Why don't they board the plane from back to front for front-door only boarding and from middle to back/middle to front for two-door boarding?.........or is that just too simple?
Creamy Goodness wrote: » Oblig. CGP Grey video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAHbLRjF0vo
Locker10a wrote: » Still doesn’t eliminate the issue of groups/families traveling together. Also the crux of the issue of overhead stowage being extremely limited and not capacious enough for a cabin full of passengers with bags. Time and time and time again I’m astonished at how quickly special or charter fights board where passengers have little to no luggage or all have a free checked bag in the hold and minimal cabin luggage. Luggage really slows it up, and if you remove it to the hold the boarding just flows and takes mere minutes, bliss !
L1011 wrote: » Gate areas in DUB aren't big enough for the multi-lane systems required to have any chance of this working basically.
PhilOssophy wrote: » Which is grand until somebody needs to help their mother/granny/child onto the plane.
Group 3 - Economy Class passengers with a window seat and companions Group 4 - Economy Class passengers with middle seats and companions Group 5 - Economy Class passengers with aisle seats
munchkin_utd wrote: » if people were to read the original text, they'd see that its not simply window passengers but window passengers and companions - which makes sense as they'll stow luggage and sit at the same time, and takes care of the kids and granny issue too
blackwhite wrote: » There's no multi-lane system needed. AMS managed it with a single boarding lane - with screens displaying the boarding sequence numbers to come up. Simple, but dependent on passengers paying attention to the screen, and to the piece of paper in their hand - worked fine on a flight that seemed to be nearly 100% business/commuter flyers - not so sure how well it would work on bucket & spade routes.
L1011 wrote: » We know from experience that absolutely nobody obeys boarding groups in DUB without lane barriers, though. Aer Lingus dropped them for a reason.
Tabnabs wrote: » The only way to really speed up the process is just an idea on a drawing board at Airbus currently.
L1011 wrote: » Turning people back from a combined lane / screen call system would lead to arguments and even further delays. Lanes are the only way to do it. Remember that people are still unable to remember the liquids rule!
munchkin_utd wrote: » if people were to read the original text, they'd see that its not simply window passengers but window passengers and companions - which makes sense as they'll stow luggage and sit at the same time, and takes care of the kids and granny issue toohttps://www.lufthansa.com/de/en/boarding
blackwhite wrote: » And yet it worked perfectly when I actually saw it in action.