nthclare wrote: » I was at an anniversary mass up the country last weekend. There was a good few of us there and lots of Protestant's over for the service, because he came from a mixed religious background. It was in a Catholic cathedral. It was going well until the priest started a rant about how some Church of Ireland pastor from the locality back in the day was studying more theology and realised that the Protestant way was wrong and embraced catholism. Ok nothing wrong with that. His own choice. There's a but, But he then went on with his own opinion about how the Catholic church was the way and the light, how it was and still is the church of Christ and the church of England/Ireland was the wrong way... I could see the Protestant congregation was getting uneasy, and honestly I felt uncomfortable myself. Being a pagan and having respect for other temple's of worship I didn't walk out, but felt like it. In this day and age isn't it more Christian to be all inclusive rather than exclusive ? This didn't feel right. It was bad enough being in there in the first place, but I went there for a friend and his widowed partner. It was like a sermon back in the 40's or something.
dvdman1 wrote: » The priest has every right to believe in what he said but it was very poor judgement to say that on front of protestants. " isnt it more Christian to be all inclusive rather than exclusive" Actually Catholics appreciate the following of scripture and beliefs regardless of modern trends...this near stuborness and the unwavering principles is what attracts people to the church.
kelly1 wrote: » The priest spoke the truth and the truth is often uncomfortable.
Davio wrote: » What parish was this in?
Iscreamkone wrote: » The priest gave his opinion.
high_king wrote: » And this is allowed why ?
Brian Poor Crawfish wrote: » Not RC but I note that this thread was started by an avowed pagan with an axe to grind against anything which claims to represent Christianity. Just look at his post on the thread about Marks gospel. All I see is an unvouched allegation. It may well be true but i would question the motive is starting the thread.He himself said he didn't want to be where he was so straight away appears to be antagonistic in being there. His other posts would demonstrate his antagonism against Christianity. As I said, it may well be true and based on things I've seen written on this forum over the years about us so called backslidden Catholics I'd not be surprised.
nthclare wrote: » I'm not the only person with an axe to grind against the Catholic church that's for sure,and you know exactly what I mean. No need to go into its endless merciless power driven ethos here. As for the Church of Ireland, they're more truer Christians than the polytheism Catholic church.
nthclare wrote: » As for the Church of Ireland, they're more truer Christians than the polytheism Catholic church.
smacl wrote: » Not sure what distinguishes Catholicism here.
recedite wrote: » Statues. Praying to saints. And that whole marian veneration/devotion thing.
smacl wrote: » Saints aren't considered as gods though so doesn't exactly qualify as polytheism.
recedite wrote: » They must be small gods though, otherwise how could they do small jobs, like finding your lost car keys?
nthclare wrote: » It was going well until the priest started a rant about how some Church of Ireland pastor from the locality back in the day was studying more theology and realised that the Protestant way was wrong and embraced catholism. Ok nothing wrong with that. His own choice. There's a but, But he then went on with his own opinion about how the Catholic church was the way and the light, how it was and still is the church of Christ and the church of England/Ireland was the wrong way...
Bob Harris wrote: » Do you think he only made those comments because he was aware of the presence of protestants? I ask because I have been at masses and witnessed priests make very pointed remarks in their sermons based entirely on who was present. Comments which would not have been made had the audience been different.
magicbastarder wrote: » i was at a funeral in east london last year - a catholic one - and the priest told the congregation that if they had not received the eucharist in the previous two weeks, they were not welcome to receive it at the mass; and he went on about this at some length. was a real fire and brimstone sermon, certainly compared to any i experienced in ireland before i stopped going to mass.