sdanseo wrote: » Why didn't they just dig at the base of it and let it fall rather than picking away at it for weeks? Surely much easier to disassemble on the ground. Seems a bit of an awkward method.
m17 wrote: » Digging out the pond on the new ross bypass 30/10/19
CoBo55 wrote: » Demolition is his speciality .. to quote Christy Moore.
josip wrote: » Great progress for just one bloke in a cherry picker
blindsider wrote: » I'm amazed that this crap comes up time and again re a bypass and how it affects local business.Firstly, people who are forced to travel thorugh a bottleneck e.g. NR almost never stop there - they want to get THROUGH the town.Secondly, this bypass has been flagged for more than 10 yrs - anyone who cared could see that this was scheduled a long time ago. Plenty of time for a business to plan accordingly. Bypasses are there to prevent traffic congestion - and not the harbinger of all evil, taking business away from a town or village
Azatadine wrote: » Yeah, what the hell are all those pedestrian crossings about? They are dangerous as hell.
sdanseo wrote: » Anyone a local? Curious to know how sentiment is split between taking away the traffic vs. fall off in trade for businesses on the old route.
JohnC. wrote: » Should that be blue, considering its not a motorway? Did someone f-up or is this some sort of allowed exception?