no.8 wrote: » Be cynical, yes
shootermacg wrote: » Didn't O'Driscoll come out with the same muck before England hammered Ireland in the 6N?
Squidgy Black wrote: » I'd be surprised if he makes it to 2023 with them. He's been a great coach for them, but the media storm combined with the fact England tend to turnover coaches at a serious rate, since Clive Woodward's 7 year spell ended in 2004 they've had 5 different head coaches including Eddie.
sydthebeat wrote: While the wales game was an abboration, it showed that know what they have to do to win.
no.8 wrote: » The most frustrating of watches. Nice to see SA given the rub of the green again. Forward pass, de Klerk yellow card missed. Poxy ref
ednwireland wrote: » has jones takne england as far as he can now , thats the real question
griffin100 wrote: » Funny how all the talk about SA’s questionable relationship with PEDs has ceased now that they’ve beaten the English. Ah well, sure there’s no drugs in Rugby, only false positives, that right Jamie?
patmac wrote: » On itv now
ScrubsfanChris wrote: » https://twitter.com/BBCSport/status/1190384267362275330?s=19
Happy4all wrote: » I must re-read Matt Dawson's article where he stated, not one of the SA players would be good enough to start for England.
Strumms wrote: » They get a fairly savage hammering I’m guessing. If they lost by 7 points in a close encounter it wouldn’t be so bad. Loosing by 20 points not having troubled the South Africa line basically the whole match.... as much credit as South Africa are due it was super apparent that after an hour that England looked shot... out of ideas and out of legs.
LuckyGent88 wrote: » Superb speech
I see sheep wrote: » ITV showing ads :mad:
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » I wonder how much of a savaging Eddie Jones and his team will get from the English media after this result.