lawred2 wrote: » Your backside can't say square when the tight head folds inwards
Sheep Shagger wrote: »
blackwhite wrote: » They didn’t there. Only one infringement after the original penalty - de Klerk out at the 22. Only the one infringement bear their line Farrell asked the same question of Garces
Mrcaramelchoc wrote: » Warren gatland is sitting up with his popcorn enjoying every second of this.up yours eddie.
MadYaker wrote: » Hope he slots this
ednwireland wrote: » SA playing to their strengths and england arent good enough
Loafing Oaf wrote: » I'm just asking about the principle of it. You've conceded a penalty in front of the post so you do whatever you have to do not to concede a try? As long as you don't get a yellow, worst 'punishment' is the penalty comes into force.
The Rape of Lucretia wrote: » Its a question of power in the forwards. England are not getting the line breaks and yards from their forwards that they were last week. SA are as strong as them on that front, and so no clear advantage. Still think Englands extra in the backs can do it for them in the second half, but they will have to play well. This shows why it was essential that Ireland play NZ in the 1/4. NZ forwards are lesser than these two packs, and had Ireland played their best they had some, low, chance of containing the ABs. But no chance of handling the Africans.
dregin wrote: » Disappointed that Garces' refusal to referee the scrum properly is the difference between the two teams here.
ThomasFlynn wrote: » England still have the capability of turning this around. At least they look like scoring a try. That SA defence was outstanding in that 15+ phase
Basil3 wrote: » But NZ easily dispatched of SA with their 'lesser forward pack'. In reality it's knock out rugby, and it all comes down to who performs on the day.
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » Seems like you know little enough about the sport if you think that.
Ready4Boarding wrote: » I don't see England turning this around. Six points is a big lead in a game so close. And not sure they deserve to. Even SA's back-play looks better. And England having to defend so narrow to counteract SA's physicality has allowed huge overlaps on the wings.
gooch2k9 wrote: » I wouldn't be parting with any money betting on this. It only takes a split second opportunity for the likes of May to change this.
is_that_so wrote: » And yet it look like an age before that will happen!