expectationlost wrote: » need some international news coverage to embarrass the government (and QIH itself) into doing something
Dual wheels wrote: » Very true, are the brits even covering it? I honestly find it incredible that someone can intimidate the county council and nothing is done about it? Even the dundons or the kinehans never did the like of that???
Strawberry Milkshake wrote: » I watched the news myself. It was just commenting on all the stuff that’s been going on in border areas rather than them being connected. As for my husband, he only half listens to what I say too so not surprised he half heard the news
Patrick2010 wrote: » Channel 4 covered it last week and did an interview with Sean Quinn who looked as guilty as f&ck. Need to send the ERU, army and special branch up there to rip down those posters and start knocking on doors. Local guards are too afraid.
Dual wheels wrote: » Agreed, they need to hound these individuals... I don’t think Quinn is the paymaster but he knows who it is
Matt Barrett wrote: » I can't see an organised group carrying out these things on his behalf not being known to him.
Dual wheels wrote: » Carrying out that activity on behalf of Sean Quinn is only a front for the real motive which is for the provos to get their cut of the profits which they did under Sean Quinn but the current ownership won’t budge... I’m no fan of Sean Quinn but I don’t think he is dumb enough to be the orchestrator of such violence
Odelay wrote: » It’s definitely the ira looking for their protection money. Plain and simple.
Seth Brundle wrote: » So "good republicans" so? Aah sure that's ok then!
Fattybojangles wrote: » No it's not the names of those involved are well known and none of them are IRA or any incarnation of it
Patrick2010 wrote: » I'm sure if the directors were getting extortion requests they would have said. The only motive we know is that this group want Sean Quinn back in charge.
Odelay wrote: » Never said there was anything ok about it. And it certainly isn’t the tidy towns committee
Sofiztikated wrote: » Those signs have been up here for what must be years at this stage. The ARU are visibly present around Cavan for an age now as well. The Lunney thing and the ATM thing is connected, the Emyvale Garda station arson isn't, that's thought to be a twat that got lifted for while drunk, and wanted "revenge". People banging on about how the garda should do this, and should do that, they're not going to broadcast what they are doing on 6One News. Its enough that every checkpoint is reported in seconds on Facebook, meaning all the toerags of the day can avoid them.
Patrick2010 wrote: » The only motive we know is that this group want Sean Quinn back in charge.
reg114 wrote: » The unrelenting nature of the harassment of the Quinn company executives combined with the length of time it has gone on and the fact it has escalated to the point where serious injury has been inflicted suggest a professional outfit are involved. Given the location there is really only one outfit that could be responsible. What was very telling, was the statement by the CEO suggesting the professional knuckledraggers perpetrating the violence and carrying out the threats were being bankrolled by the money man behind them .. I think we know full well who the money man is. I would argue that the relationship between the money man and the aggressors is a long one that in its heyday permitted his business to grow unmolested through the height of the troubles. As far as the polices failure to resolve this ongoing campaign of terror, it simply comes down to priorities. Neither the PSNI nor the Gardai think this is significant enough an issue to commit resources. Perhaps to investigate would in fact open a can of worms that might point to a history of the authorities turning a blind eye to infringements and lawlessness along the border. It seems especially mystifying that this campaign of terror against the Quinn executives continues unabated now that former PSNI Drew is the new garda commissioner. Someone will end up being killed and then the sh$t will really hit the fan.
Discodog wrote: » Would it have been possible for a business of that size to operate on the border without paying their "dues" ? Would the recipients happily sit back & accept that the money has stopped flowing ?