unkel wrote: » My favourite alt coin has been doing very well the last few weeks, massive gains not only against BTC, but also against USD I don't have any BTC but if that happened, I might be tempted to sell some of my alt coin off and buy BTC to hold & forget
Arrival wrote: » Hoping for a €4-5k BTC like many people online seemed to be anticipating, would be a handy dip
SauNewb wrote: » I think Neo has a lot further to fall. Will probably wait 2/3 days and see where it is at. The whole market is red today. Don't think it will bounce back tomorrow. All speculation.
Lex Luthor wrote: » its been fairly bloody for a few days now, maybe a week presents opportunity to accumulate more at the lower prices and cost average out
Gerald Obedient Manicurist wrote: » Taking profits ?
SauNewb wrote: » Taking a short position on Neo. It will be probably be $20 tomorrow - but I'm hoping the recent hype has died.https://www.coindesk.com/china-is-poised-for-another-crypto-trading-crackdown-as-speculation-returns
makeorbrake wrote: » Absolutely....far more tangible. If the crypto-media wanted to pin it on something - this would have been far more logical.
Gerald Obedient Manicurist wrote: » The naysayers will still slag me off for losing 45% on some purchases. Bitcoin goes up, I buy. Bitcoin goes down, I buy even more.
unkel wrote: » Well it's bound to do that if you keep feeding it funds every week
Gerald Obedient Manicurist wrote: » My portfolio hit an all time high this week
Bob24 wrote: » Having said that it seems like this announcement wasn't random and will be bullish for blockchain (not bitcoin) in China. Apparently it was the headline of all national papers the following day and universities started to offer blockchain programs within a few hours after the speach.
Bob24 wrote: » Also interesting is that is part of this Bakkt numbers seem to have been picking up.
makeorbrake wrote: » The short squeeze scenario is very plausible. However, the first initial spike being 'genuine buyers' - i'm not so sure. It's over the space of minutes - that's not organic movement. If it's coming from retail sources, then it requires a bit of planning (putting money on account). The Chinese announcement - I guess it's possible that some got caught up with that but they are seriously misguided if they did. And then there are those that are taking solace from that alleged response. Figures for searches for Bitcoin on Wechat and Baidu are being presented on CryptoTwitter - but they don't point out that the uptick in searches was as a result of the uptick in price that was already underway! I'm exactly where I've been with this for the last few months - bullish in the long term but this is a fake-out for me on the short term. Of course, it can be a fakeout and still build from here (it's climbing again as I write this). I may miss another moonshot but I'm content to sit this one out for now.
Bob24 wrote: » The first spike was genuine buyers, but as Grumpypants was saying the second wave was mostly due to forced purchases caused by the resulting short squeeze.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » Only 12. I still manage to know more about crypto than the rest of you put together though.
el diablo wrote: » Thanks for your deep insight Johnny. Inspired by seventeen pints of Guinness no doubt.
makeorbrake wrote: » I This is just the crypto media trying to tack on a 'reason' after the fact.
makeorbrake wrote: » It is encouraging though that there was some $$ to follow through after that initial move :-D
Bob24 wrote: » If this is the case Xi’s comment was misunderstood though. My understanding is that he meant something like “blockchain, not Bitcoin”.
Bob24 wrote: » You can never know if explanations given after the fact are correct, but I think that one is plausible (certainly, the short squeeze aspect is more than likely what happened). If this is the case Xi’s comment was misunderstood though. My understanding is that he meant something like “blockchain, not Bitcoin”.
Grumpypants wrote: » The China comment triggered a jump and that triggered a bunch of shorts to be liquidated. Because the volume overall is low (by trading standards) those purchases spiked the price.