irishbucsfan wrote: » If South Africa play like that and England play to their potential then this could easily be the most one-sided final of all time. And we should have been in it... WE SHOULD BE THE ONES GETTING PUMPED BY ENGLAND NEXT WEEKEND GOD DAMMIT!
sydthebeat wrote: » I honestly hope England hop the sh!t out of that bokke team for serving up that tripe... And I think they will too. England can match their power, play a game to keep the ball away from hard contact, and they have the backs to mezmerise those South African backs
Bobblehats wrote: » Sort of tense semi I enjoyed (as a neutral) tbh. Carbon copied each other’s scores and went to the wire
Letwin_Larry wrote: » i really have to chuckle at all the disparaging comments, when we all know Irish fans would give their right arm, leg and everything else to play any kind of rugby, if it meant getting this far. sadly for us we play muck rugby, but still can't progress beyond the quarters.
sligeach wrote: » South Africa should have kicked the easy penalty points at the end. I'm sure there's some people out there that lost bets as a result. Likewise, there may be some that won as a result.
ThomasFlynn wrote: » Bookies: England 5/8 South Africa 8/5
Exclamation Marc wrote: » Pollard is one of the most polarising out halves at a tier one team as regards ability. Utterly solid and calmness personified kicking penalties and conversions but abysmal around the pitch either passing or kicking from hands.
Exclamation Marc wrote: » Agreed. If the performances are in any way similar to this weekend, England will win by 30+. I need a week off rugby just so I don't have to watch another bloody box kick for a while.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Have to agree...found that thoroughly engrossing and enjoyable because of that.
bilston wrote: » It became engrossing from the moment Da Allende scored. The last 20 mins made up for the rest. Still, there appears a gulf between yesterday's game and today's, but next week will be a different sort of game. SA will be able to offset England's power. But England's attacking shape is very impressive and England will be big favourites.
Augme wrote: » People can moan about it not being entertaining or not being good for the game. Bollox tbh. I doubt anyone switched that game off. As for this world cup, the only game in the knockout stages that was awful was Ireland game because it was over as a contest after 20 minutes. Every other game as been a contest for a least the majority of it. That's what I want in a world cup.
no.8 wrote: » Nonsense. This year we have a NH vs. a SH side in the final (NH sides barely showed up in 2015...except Scotland who were shafted). Yesterday was a masterclass by England. Japan lit up the tournament. Upsets in the mix. Wales v Australia, NZ v SA, some tight contests.
thebaz wrote: » Nonsense ?? - This year has been a poor spectacle overall - apart from England and Japan it has been totally forgettable, was really looking forward to it but have found as dissapointing as the Irish challenge.
swiwi_ wrote: » I know I have zero moral high ground from which to preach, given my team was chewed up and spat out yesterday...but that was anti-rugby. What a deadly dull game. Up there with the 2007 final. I think I might just have to support England. At least they use their backs.