System Upgrade Dear EV Drivers, To enable us to provide you with some enhanced functionality and a new app, we will be performing a system upgrade this coming Wednesday morning, October 2nd,
unkel wrote: » For some cars like all the Nissan Leafs, with their CHAdeMO charging, there would be no difference at all, still stuck at 43kW (2009). And they would not be able to charge at all at Tesla Superchargers or Ionity fast chargers as neither support that obsolete Japanese protocol.
unkel wrote: » Tesla Model 3 (the best selling car in some European countries this year) can charge at up to 250kW at Tesla Supercharger 3 and at up to nearly 200kW at Ionity 350kW chargers (2019). For some cars like all the Nissan Leafs, with their CHAdeMO charging, there would be no difference at all, still stuck at 43kW (2009). And they would not be able to charge at all at Tesla Superchargers or Ionity fast chargers as neither support that obsolete Japanese protocol.
this.lad wrote: » But your ioniq etc., of which there are many is well catered for too. In fairness they have a limited pot of money. Theres no point in meeting 25% of a future need now rather than the current need. Fot those using the M9, as i do myself, its better to have these than to have nothing, which was the case up to this week. Surely a mixture of differing speed and capacity sites is the best approach? In any event, theres 2 chargers south of Naas now that will surely help drivers. The fact that its motorway access only, and soon to be paid for, should keep the pressure off and ensure some level of availability.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Better but still not like EV, still need to wait for the Auto Box and Revs. Even my Brothers DSG seems like it takes forever to get going.
Mike9832 wrote: » Thats cause your i3 is a genuinely quick car 1300kg/170bhp is quick, quicker than alot of yokes on the road Drive a DSG Polo with 170bhp and it won't be slow, will do its manufacture rated 0-60 of 7 secs all day, just like an EV From a roll the dsg will not be as quick initially, but will catch up quickly
Mancomb Seepgood wrote: » Call me a filthy commie but a large part of the EV fleet consists of used Nissan Leafs,1.0 and 1.5 gen and some provision needs to be available for them to charge in a reasonable time. I agree that Nissan should have ditched Chademo for the new Leaf,at least in Europe.No skin in this myself since I have a Zoe with the unloved AC43 protocol,but if there is a mass rollout of 22kw chargers I'll be fine.
unkel wrote: » Indeed. I'll give you a rough guide so: petrol car 15c/km diesel car 10c/km EV charged at home at night rate 1c/km EV charged on paid ESB chargers 4c/km
Black_Knight wrote: » Early gen leaf drivers who have been using the public network have likely been doing so because it was free, and until this year it probably wasn't as congested. No one who needs to regularly drive beyond their cars range would consider owning that car. Free charging kept old leafs doing these "out of range" drives for a few years too many. Now with fees, i'd suspect many will find a better tool for the job and sell up their leafs.
Round Cable wrote: » As a 24kwh Leaf owner, I wouldn't agree. I haven't used an ESB fast charger in 15 months, as the network was clogged with free loaders. Now that paid charging and multiple rapids are going to be installed at the same site, I plan on using my car for longer distance travel.
Silent Running wrote: » A while ago, I arrived in my Ioniq at a rapid charger in Dublin where a Leaf was charging. I needed a charge to get back to Wexford, so had to wait. I got chatting to the Leaf owner who was happy to tell me that he's been charging for free for 5 years. I asked about his home charging costs. "Oh I don't have a charger at home" he said. I recognised him later in a photograph of the top table at an IEVOA meeting. Said it all for me. A lot of freeloaders are in for an awakening.
Mancomb Seepgood wrote: » Yeah,those people exist.Some people seem to just treat it as part of their day,I can't even imagine how the savings justify it.Surely there are better things to do with your time?I can imagine making myself depend on public charging for five years, it's the stuff of nightmares!
knipex wrote: » You have a nasty habit of pulling "estimates" that while wildly off just happen to support your argument and HATE being pulled on it. your figures are so far from reality as to be blatant nonsense and misinformation disguised as informed approximates. EV's are a good proposition in their own right, They don't need massaged figures to justify ownership. .
Black_Knight wrote: » So do you regularly drive outside your cars range, this relying on the public network? Doesn't sound like you're the leaf (EV) driver type I'm talking about. Don't hold your breath for those multiple fast charger stations either.
green123 wrote: » Unkel why do you keep posting such misleading wrong information? I had an argument with you before about night rate electricity where you were also posting misleading figures. Are you deliberately posting misleading figures to skew the numbers in favour of electric vehicles? Or are you really just not able to understand and work out the accurate numbers?
KCross wrote: » As for PHEV's.... they shouldnt be on the rapids in the first place, imo, so thats a good thing.
daheff wrote: » My reading was this charge is going to be for all chargers, not just fast chargers?
KCross wrote: » There is enough negativity around EVs that we need to be accurate with our figures otherwise it will come across as bias... that’s all it is.
Black_Knight wrote: » To be fair, the figures we're taking about are based on a broad range of makes/models and fuel of cars. And makes/models of fridges (think that was the bone of contention in the other thread). The figures range is going to be broad. Even the cost of electricity is going to vary.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Here's real figures for anyone who likes it. lets go with a 55 Mpg diesel which averages 55 mpg per tank , no " on the Motorway" madness I hear all to often. Right lets get down to it. lets say over my distance per year of around 30,000 Kms. 55 mpg is 5.13 L/100 Km = 19.47 Km/Litre19.47/30,000 = 1,540 litres of Diesel required @ 1.47 C/Litre ? = 2,263 EurosElectric Take a Nissan Leaf, my average as per car wings was about 18.5 Kwh/100 Km per year so we'll go with that. 18.5/100 = 5.40 or 5.40 Km per Kwh 30,000 Kms / 5.40 = 5,555 Kwh needed So, Day rate electricity 16.5 C/100 Km Multiply by 5,555 Kwh = 916 EuroNight Rate 7.4 Cent multiply by 5,555 Kwh = 411 Euros on Night rate. Bear in mind, these calculations are based on the average and can go up or down based on consumption. I got work charging so I would pay probably half that to drive 30,000 Kms a year including some Petrol in the Rex and the i3 is more efficient than the Leaf, Ioniq is more efficient again. etc.
Mike9832 wrote: » Diesel @ 1.47 a litre? I got it for 1.29 for today U going to include these ESB new charge rates? Or does everyone live a 100km radius from everything? Any long trip and best selling EVs like Ioniq, Leaf etc need to charge at 150km or so
Black_Knight wrote: » Surely trolling given the last post
Mike9832 wrote: » How so?
Black_Knight wrote: » Lad gives specifics about his real world scenario, after a post suggesting any example of saves should mention specific numbers, but you're calling him out on a whole plethora of numbers and scenarios that are not relevant to him. I actually thought your post was mocking/pulling this piss out of the whole "be specific" post. Had a chuckle when I read it, then it seemed you were being serious.