punisher5112 wrote: » The price and the data threw it for me.... Best deal I've ever seen and I just hope the signal will be up to it for me.
frosty123 wrote: » Can anyone confirm this?.. please
AlmightyCushion wrote: » People aren't signing up because they seen some eejit pulling a stupid pose. They're signing up because it's a tenner a month. A lot of the interest was from the initial post on this thread which had none of those marketing images. If this was €30 a month, nobody would be interested in it. The marketing images are shíte, that doesn't change whether the offering is good value or not. If they had some other marketing images people would still be aware of it and they would still be signing up for it.
fletch wrote: » Why is it terrible?
Pen Rua wrote: » And yet here we are, all swayed by the marketing (which encompases the 9.99 price tag) with a significant chunk of posters going for it. I would suggest the marketing is working. People are aware of the brand, and they have a very specific demo. Are the people in this thread that are giving out about the campaign part of this demo they're targeting? i.e. twenty somethings looking for "subscription" pricing (note how bill pay is almost absent from their marketing... it's "9.99 a month..." just like Spotify / Netflix...).
AlmightyCushion wrote: » The ads are shít just like the website. It's just a bunch of pictures young people doing stupid poses in front of a solid colour background. It's so generic. They could be advertising anything. Just look at this image with the tag line 'Simplicity': How does a picture of some gimp with a terrible tracksuit and constipation convey simplicity? Regardless, the price is still great.
punisher5112 wrote: » One thing that's terrible is the ads as it doesn't look like there is one Irish person in it....
Somedaythefire wrote: » They all "look Irish" to me.
Lamar Skinny Mill wrote: » I get a bit of a 90's vibe from those ads, not sure if it is the bright, garish colours or the clothing the actors wear. Still I don't buy a service because of their ads!
Suckit wrote: » Talking about the pros and cons and what the actual catch may be "There's always a catch" On radio one right nowhttps://www.rte.ie/radio1/
pat1981 wrote: » Ordered 2 sims, received. Started the porting process at 1pm yesterday still showing in progress, was with virgin previously. gomo chat now is unavailable, looks like i'll have to send a email and wait.
Hibernicis wrote: » Sign-up complete. Bye Bye Vodafone. It’s been nice knowing you these last 25 years..... ever since my eircell 088
Fr_Dougal wrote: » ‘Chat is unavailable, try later’
Bluefoam wrote: » Seems like a good idea. More controllable and means that Sims aren't assigned to be ported before they arrive. Impressive how they've managed to change the system to react to real life situations.
Sparkrite wrote: » Phew! RE.:- people not bothering to try to help themselves by spending a little, of their own, time doing a search but instead expect other people to waste/spend their time to answer a post when it has been answered many many times before, is in my estimation the height of bad manners. It is in effect, saying, "My time is too important to spend time searching, but yours isn't."
forgodssake wrote: » Yes I understand that but why not just reply "this is already answered " instead of unnecesssry ridiculing comments like "did you not even read the website " or "answered a million times already ". Absolutely no need for it . I've made my point . Hope someone sees it and agrees and does something about it . Back to topic.
Gadgetman496 wrote: » I wonder how long one can take before deciding to port a number over? Will the option be in your account permanently or will it be removed at some stage?
