peteeeed wrote: » That's dim
drunkmonkey wrote: » Triggered by the possibility of her running, not a hope, I really hope she does. If you think Hillary is squeaky clean and a role model for female politicans your vote should be taken off you.
drunkmonkey wrote: » Patience, it's coming. Don't forget this is the 4th impeachment call. It'd be niave to think Trump hasn't his guys filling a warchest with evidence to start marking charges.
duploelabs wrote: » So you're not acknowledging that you've been duped by her joke? Oh bless your heart
drunkmonkey wrote: » Oh she's a comedian now I'm sure Tulsi shares your opinion.
The State Department discovered nearly 600 security incidents that violated agency policy, according to a report the Daily Caller News Foundation obtained. The investigation, conducted by the State Department’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security, found 38 individuals were culpable for 91 security violations. Another 497 violations were found, but no individuals were found culpable in those incidents. The investigation sought to determine if the exchange of emails on Clinton’s server “represented failure to properly safeguard classified information” and whether any individuals at State were culpable for any of the failures.
One reason that investigators were unable to assign culpability in the 497 incidents was because of the duration of the investigation. Many of the subjects of the probe, including Clinton and her circle of aides, has left the State Department by the time the investigation began.
The U.S. State Department is reviving its probe into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s email server, this time examining the items sent from over a hundred current and former employees of the department. State has contacted at least 130 people, some of whom were high-ranking officials and others who were low-rung information processors. But they all have one thing in common: their emails found their way into Clinton’s inbox, the Washington Post reported Saturday.
duploelabs wrote: » So I'm still waiting on the other 3 formal impeachment announcements you claimed, cmon now
drunkmonkey wrote: » Read what I said then rephrase your question so it some ways resembles what I said. The dims have been crying impeachment since he was elected in case you didn't notice.
duploelabs wrote: » You said... "Don't forget this is the 4th impeachment call." Show me the other 3
Beasty wrote: » Stick to the topic - it's the Trump impeachment Inquiry, not complaints about other US political figures.
peteeeed wrote: » After all the headlines
drunkmonkey wrote: » Just shows how corrupt Hillary is and also how untouchable, Barr has enough there to take her to task, will he though. That woman should be in jail, unbelievably though she's possibly going to run again judging by her actions against her other dimocrats.
mad muffin wrote: » Hold on now hombres. Let’s pump the brakes there a little bit. Let’s not get all excited just yet. This was State Department investigators probing Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server as secretary of state.
Cody montana wrote: » I’m not a fan of Hillary but how many times has she been investigated now? Every time she has been cleared. Why should she be in jail? Why shouldn’t Trump be in jail?
Cody montana wrote: » NEW: 54% of Americans now support the impeachment inquiry
y0ssar1an22 wrote: » how long can the statement of charges last for?
drunkmonkey wrote: » The dims have been crying impeachment since he was elected in case you didn't notice.
SJW Lover wrote: » Trump has been under investigation more or less the entire duration of his Presidency. What has been found? Nothing. Why not try affording Trump some of the same leeway you give Hillary.
MadYaker wrote: » Trump has narrowly avoided committing a felony / another impeachable offence by moving the G7 out of his resort. How could he have thought he was getting away with that one.
MadYaker wrote: » Well he must have gotten the message somehow, id say his lawyers had a word.
rossie1977 wrote: » Just to point out Republicans wanted to impeach Obama over: Bathroom bill https://www.reuters.com/article/us-oklahoma-lgbt/some-in-oklahoma-statehouse-urge-obama-impeachment-over-bathroom-rule-idUSKCN0YB1Z0 Not extending Bush tax cuts https://thinkprogress.org/norquist-republicans-will-impeach-obama-if-he-doesnt-extend-bush-tax-cuts-24c5879d6c6/ Benghazi https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2014/05/republicans-want-to-impeach-president-obama-for-benghazi-gop-fears-they-will-look-crazy.html Using executive orders https://www.mediamatters.org/michael-savage/savage-declares-emerging-dictator-obama-be-out-control-and-says-i-think-it-time Not defending marriage law https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/387455?section=Headline&keywords=Gingrich-Obama-Constitutional-Crisis&year=2011&month=02&date=25&id=387455&oref=www.mediamatters.org Arab spring https://www.mediamatters.org/tammy-bruce/right-wing-radio-host-tammy-bruce-calls-obama-be-investigated-possibly-impeached-over?redirect_source=/blog/2011/02/01/right-wing-radio-host-tammy-bruce-calls-for-oba/17584 https://www.theamericanconservative.com/2011/03/24/impeach-barack-obama/ A prisoner exchange https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/06/23/south-dakota-wants-to-impeach-president-obama-theyll-have-to-get-in-line/ Illegal immigrants and debt https://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/sarah-palin-impeach-barack-obama-108658 Obama became dictator https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/327491-bachmann-house-could-impeach-dictator-obama Pushing his agenda https://www.politico.com/story/2011/08/rep-burgess-impeach-obama-060949 Because they did not like him and would find something https://newrepublic.com/article/78198/republicans-impeach-obama In 8 years Obama or any of his team were not indicted or convicted of any crime and nobody was jailed.
notobtuse wrote: » Your point? Democrats have tried to impeach every Republican president since Ronald Reagan.
Matt Barrett wrote: » Surely not war criminal G.W. who brought the U.S. into an illegitimate war so pals could make money? The curs Point might be low grade party elects low grade people to run for President?
notobtuse wrote: » It doesn't matter who the Republican president is, or what they have done, because Democrats will be using the tactic of impeachment by making $hit up against Republicans, forever more, knowing the media have become mere scribes of the DNC.
Matt Barrett wrote: » I would think it would. Making up stuff like the birther movement?
rossie1977 wrote: » I was replying to Pete who was complaining about attempts to impeach Trump. My point was Obama released his tax returns, he didn't employee family members in high ranking positions or not divest from his business, no examples of obstruction of justice.. In 8 years no member of the Obama team was criminally indicted, convicted of a crime or sent to prison. And yet we have multiple attempts to impeach the guy. Republicans didn't even need a reason to impeach as they in their own words 'would find a way'. In less than 2 years there have been 89 criminal indictments under this current President. 22 prison sentences handed out during Nixon, Reagan and Bush Jr terms. 1 prison sentence and 1 criminal conviction during the terms of Carter, Clinton and Obama and yet it's funny that's when an impeachment happened.
