Tell me how wrote: » He's going against Benn???? Court beckons!
ancapailldorcha wrote: » Don't think I've ever appreciated this thread as much until today, standing in the rain at Parliament Square. Thanks for the updates, all.
DrumSteve wrote: » Check Ian Dunts twitter feed noted above, he's tweeting the whole thing in real time.
devnull wrote: » Letwin Bill - ResultsAyes 322Noes 306 Majority 16
thecretinhop wrote: » wat are u doing there?
GM228 wrote: » An important passage from today's judgement from the Inner House:-https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=7a2e72a7-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7 The situation remains fluid. What is known is that, over the next two weeks, circumstances will inevitably change. If 19 October comes and goes without either of the two conditions in the 2019 Act having been satisfied and in the absence of the letter which the Prime Minister would then be required to send, the petitioners would be entitled to return to court and seek an order ordaining the PM to comply with the terms of the 2019 Act within a prescribed, and possibly very short, period. It is only once that period has expired without the order being obtempered that the court would consider authorising an official to sign the letter which the PM may have failed to do. The court has essentially stated that providing the need arises if Johnson does not send an extension letter it will issue an order that he must do so within a small time frame and if he still refuses to do so it will consider using the nobile officium power to authorise someone else to do so. The Outer House judgement from Monday is effectively null and void.
The situation remains fluid. What is known is that, over the next two weeks, circumstances will inevitably change. If 19 October comes and goes without either of the two conditions in the 2019 Act having been satisfied and in the absence of the letter which the Prime Minister would then be required to send, the petitioners would be entitled to return to court and seek an order ordaining the PM to comply with the terms of the 2019 Act within a prescribed, and possibly very short, period. It is only once that period has expired without the order being obtempered that the court would consider authorising an official to sign the letter which the PM may have failed to do.
Itssoeasy wrote: » So Boris is saying he’s not going to ask the EU for an more time.
Enzokk wrote: » Johnson is up,https://twitter.com/IanDunt/status/1185554398841360384?s=20 No my friend, you will need to send that letter and think you can get a deal done in the time. The time for the opposition is near, as soon as he has asked for the extension they need to move on a VONC of GNU to get a second referendum on Brexit.
Headshot wrote: » Funny that's 7 votes in a row BJ has lost
Tell me how wrote: » Conservatives giving 2 fingers to SNP once again with walking out as Joanna Cherry starts to speak.
FrancieBrady wrote: » not in a row...he broke his duck on some minor legislation
brickster69 wrote: » All of the EU now is facing no deal. Benn bill is flawed
GM228 wrote: » How do you come to that conclusion?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/bed6f1d088326d5eb21c0139847332c7.svg)
