freddy99 wrote: » Coverage pretty abysmal in Ashbourne. Coverage chart shows solid 4G...however reality is very different. Have tried Meteor APN as well as Eirmobile. Both equally pathetic. 1.2Mb download, 0.2Mb upload.
Fieldog wrote: » You aren't the only one complaining about Ashbourne, must be a bit of a bad spot for coverage... I used to work out there and never had an issue on Eir but maybe things have changed?
fritzelly wrote: » So many people b*tching about the speed not being the same as some other provider Reality is you probably never even use those speeds except when doing a speed test (like every new GoMo customer is trying to do this week)
GM228 wrote: » Seeing as how GoMo is owned by Eir does anyone know if a SIM will be recognised in a locked to Eir iPhone? Ordinarily I would say no, but I remember when Eir took over Meteor that their SIMs worked fine in locked to Meteor phones.
fritzelly wrote: » Worst kind of time of year if there is a forest between you and the mast - lots of foliage covered in moisture
scary wrote: » But you do agree surely if its the same company providing the service they should be comparable?
killbillvol2 wrote: » What are you waffling about? Co. Meath is not noted for its forests.
fritzelly wrote: » It's called an analogy
killbillvol2 wrote: » Did you actually read any of this thread? Numerous people have posted speed tests showing that GoMo and Eir speeds are pretty much identical. And while they're not that fast, the majority were well over 10 Mbps.
fritzelly wrote: » Do you expect Nescafe Original to be the same as Nescafe Gold even tho it's cheaper???
scary wrote: » And thats all i expect.
scary wrote: » No but i expect 4g data speeds with Eir to be the same as 4g data speeds with Eir.
killbillvol2 wrote: » So what are you talking about?
scary wrote: » Im waiting to see that what GoMo are providing is similar to what Eir provides, as its what I expect. So far it seems as that wont be the case apart from some sporadic comparisons which say they are the same.Disappointing really.
killbillvol2 wrote: » Your posts are nonsense. I surrender.
westyIrl wrote: » Hopefully the exodus to Eir will improve 3 for us remainers
scary wrote: » Really? what an ignorant way of viewing things. why would it concern you so much? I'm trying to get info if it upsets you to the point of surrender maybe you should log off for abit and not get so involved.
fritzelly wrote: » You are being very pendantic about something you wouldn't even notice in daily use. Unless you are downloading multi GB files (on a phone why would you) and desperate for time you could survive on 5Mbs very happily and not know the difference if you had 100Mbs download speed People complaining about a technology they barely have a grasp of how it works (And Gomo are a fraction of what anyone else is charging for "all in")
sportsfan90 wrote: » Bootsy can I ask where are you that's 10 mins from the city that has bad coverage? I'm a similar distance and was considering making the move to GoMo, but perhaps we're in different directions from the city?
antodeco wrote: » Think about it like this. 100K sign up. Everyone ports. Realised the network is terrible. Ports back month 2. Nice easy 2 million euro for eir
joefuss1986 wrote: » Don't forget the activation fee. Only adds another million.