Eric Cartman wrote: » considering how the EU feels about our rate, I would only imagine on the very slim chance of them getting back into the EU, that not dropping it below 19% would be the basis of any agreement to let them in to stop precisely that.
A Dub in Glasgo wrote: » Westminster decided Rockall was part of the UK and allocated it to Scotland with its own exclusion zone around it and fisheries is devolved to Scotland therefore Scotland is implementing Westminster law
Jayferg wrote: » Food for thoughthttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/here-s-why-scotland-is-in-sights-of-putin-s-russia-andrew-foxall-and-james-rogers-1-4890453/amp
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » I don't hide behind it because it's bad for Ireland, I'm pretty open about saying it's bad for Ireland. And I lack a penchant for all things British/UK as equally as I lack a penchant for all things Scottish. I'm pretty ambivalent about Catalan independence, because I don't think it would have the same effect on Ireland as Scottish independence would. So I'm not hiding behind anything.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » With the Catalan situation still unresolved Scotland may be a long way from EU membership so it could be a moot point.
US2 wrote: » This "we voted remain" is nonsense. Should gay marriage still be illegal in rosscomon ?
Aegir wrote: » if the SNP want independence, they should get the English to vote on it.
rock22 wrote: » The SNP, while saying they want to join the EU after an independence vote are also saying they want to retain their own currency etc. They appear to believe they would have the same exceptions the UK won for itself.
derrymcorry wrote: » A Do you believe that it would be in the best interests of the Scottish people to become an indpendent country within the EU?
derrymcorry wrote: » I, as an Irish republican, would be delighted to see an indpendent Scotland as I believe they could be our best friend within the EU now with England gone.
derrymcorry wrote: » Also, think about the benefits that Scottish independence could have for Irish reunification.
A Dub in Glasgo wrote: » If Scotland becomes independent it will have to have its own currency (which they can peg to Sterling if they wish).
Jim2007 wrote: » There is no obligation on them to do so, they could just adapt Sterling if they wished. A Scottish central bank and government issuing bonds etc... in Sterling would cause headaches for the BOE, but's life.
Jim2007 wrote: » You need to open you mind a bit. There is noting stopping Scotland from joining EFTA and accessing the single market via the EEA agreement, the same as Norway. In fact it would probably suit them much better than EU membership.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » But the whole resurgence in Scottish independence since the 2014 referendum has been around the idea that they are being dragged out of the EU by the English.
If independence is possible without EU membership then it's not as appealing is it ?
TeaBagMania wrote: » Not only should Scotland become independent from england but we should unit our clans and become one Celtic nation with Scotland
A Dub in Glasgo wrote: » Scotland cannot currently make any decision about EFTA/EU/EEA or any other group as they are hitched to whatever England whats to do and England currently does not want to do what is in Scotlands interests
Aegir wrote: » Is a hard border with England in Scotland’s interests?
Overheal wrote: » If they wanted to secede I mean sure, wish them luck
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » especially for people and businesses along the border between Scotland and England.
Zubeneschamali wrote: » The border between Scotland and England is much more straightforward then the NI/Republic border. It is only 154 km long vs. 500 km in Ireland, and a lot of it is across remote/mountainous national park. Berwick-upon-Tweed is the only biggish town nearby, and it is only 12,000 people, so similar to Strabane vs. Derry with 90,000.
Aegir wrote: » It’s still a border though and would still mean regulatory and customs checks. If the Irish back stop was just about it being a bit difficult then the UK would have left the Eu by now. It will be ignored by Scottish Nationalists though and written off as project fear.
circadian wrote: » The SNP have been actively planning this for years. I'd hazard a guess they'd be a lot more organised than the absolute chaos that is Brexit. The behaviour towards Scottish politicians has been abhorrent. I can guarantee that treating the majority party in a regional Parliament in such a way will result in a response. The current government is burning bridges left, right and centre at the minute and I can't tell if it's a result of arrogance or sheer stupidity.
A Dub in Glasgo wrote: » 1. The Tories are refusing another Section 30 order therefore there is no referendum confirmed and is unlikely to take place for at least another 4-6 months if the order was agreed 2. If Scotland voted for independence then it will probably be another 2 years before independence takes place 3. Scotland would not join the EU immediately as it will need to demonstrate how it meets the criteria 4. It is reasonable to suggest that Scotland and rUK would enjoy a CTA similar to Ireland and UK 5. It is reasonable to suggest that some sort of trade agreement will take place between Scotland and rUK 6. The UK trade arrangement with the EU is unknown at this point therefore we do not know what the border will look like if Scotland joins the EU
Aegir wrote: » what sort of response? are the SNP going to declare war or something?