Fix Thy Foot! wrote: » i believe the EU/Dublin rightly believed they could fob Treesa off and send her scurrying back and forth to Westminster like a madwoman. In that they succeeded. But then BoJo entered stage-left and they quickly realised they were dealing with a totally different animal. Suddenly they were in a game of hardball. They knew they were not going to get away with treating Johnson & Cummings like they did Treesa. The rules had changed. Prologation, dodging the Benn Act do or die etc. was no accident. Juncker Barnier & Leo knew a compromise had to be reached or this guy was likely to pull the pin.
irishfeen wrote: » It will be interesting to see if the DUP’s stance will move anyone in the ERG to vote against the deal... sounds coming out at the minute seem to suggest they will follow BJ.
Bambi wrote: » Was the GFA an agreement between the people of Northern Ireland with themselves? I don't recall unilateral withdrawal clauses for NI being a part of the deal.
wally1990 wrote: » I know this might be a stupid question but I need to ask... All I am hearing is a deal is agreed with the EU Deal here, deal there and bit of information about whats in the deal on the news. Where can I actually read the deal or the key information? All the news articles I'm finding are just high level news with no actually details about the deal and all that is contained with the UK leaving the EU. I'm learning nothing from reading the general news. I want to be able to read about VAT, Goods and trade, Visa issues , tariffs, and much more. Is there any actual link to the deal OR a high quality article on the latest deal? Thanks all. wally1990 is online now Report Post
giveitholly wrote: » I presume it will be evening time when this vote happens on Saturday?
Bambi wrote: » You can't know anything of the sort to a certainty, you're being ridiculous. As before, be honest. You would have said the same about Trump, Johnson, Corbyn, Brexit etc. There goes another rubber tree plant, to quote a song on the topic
FrancieBrady wrote: » How is the GFA 'compromised' by a 'consent' principle being enshrined in a WA?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Labour’s Ronnie Campbell on RTE’s Primetime has said he will vote for this deal. How many more I wonder?
Deleted User wrote: » Labour’s Ronnie Campbell on RTE’s Primetime has said he will vote for this deal. How many more I wonder?
Imreoir2 wrote: » Dublin clearly felt that the compromise was acceptable based on the significantly reduced risk of a hard border ever happening as a result of this arangement. I am inclined to agree with that decision. Holding hard to a red line when you are largely getting what you want anyway is the politics of a fool.
theological wrote: » Also he added democratic input from the people of Northern Ireland into their own affairs in this deal. The concerns of a backstop without democratic say gone. Johnson has exceeded my expectation by a long way. He did what people in this thread said he couldn't do Repeating the same arguments that lost 3 years ago won't work. A deal that delivers good proximity to the EU whilst leaving is a compromise. This deal delivers Brexit. Time to get this done and move on.
ancapailldorcha wrote: » I think if we are in the EU this time next month then Brexit is dead. We leave at Hallowe'en or we don't at all.
Bambi wrote: » At least, you're admitting we compromised now
I was desperate to avoid undermining the GFA, so much for that. I thought Leo and everyone else here was too. So much for that I was okay with a Hard Border due to a hard Brexit because that would have been resolved in quick time, once the brits felt the pinch. If someone had posted last week that Leo was going to give the NI assembly a perpetual veto on the border arrangement all these posters would havesaid that it would never happen and red lines wont be crossed blah blah Today they think its a wonderful idea, because Tony Connellys sources say its kosher. Mad stuff altogether. Its like when SF were running around waving flags and claiming victory when the provos finally saw sense and packed it in. Some people are easily sold a yarn
irishfeen wrote: » Peston on ITV saying there is a good chance this will pass on Saturday, ironically it could very well be the rebel Labour MP’s and not the DUP that ensure its passage.
Joe_ Public wrote: » Dorries obviously just trying to stir things up and I heard that interview with Corbyn suggesting they wouldn't whip. I just think that's wishful thinking in his part, that they'll all row in behind him with no pressure. Think he'll have to listen to his front bench and apply the whip.
ancapailldorcha wrote: » I'm basing it on this:https://twitter.com/NadineDorries/status/1184163018705424387 Not an idea source I know, especially that the New European is reporting pretty much the opposite. Of course, this might not be accurate and things but Corbyn knows that he can't be party to a Conservative Brexit. It's the same reason that Harold Wilson called the referendum in 1975. That's a colossal if though.
Joe_ Public wrote: » Is it confirmed that Labour will whip against it? I am assuming they will but haven't heard any announcement to that effect. Corbyn said yesterday they wouldn't, but I have a feeling that will change.
Bambi wrote: » Once its agreed there's no recourse for international problems...
Bambi wrote: » I was desperate to avoid undermining the GFA, so much for that. I thought Leo and everyone else here was too. So much for thatI was okay with a Hard Border due to a hard Brexit because that would have been resolved in quick time, once the brits felt the pinch.
sliabh 1956 wrote: » Why is Miriam so worried about the DUP they are not really too concerned about us why must be allways expected to appease them when they could nt give two figs about the Republic. She was te same some weeks ago on a debate about the backstop.