briany wrote: » It's an interesting idea, but I don't know how it would work in practice. We can say on a casual basis that Irish and Scottish people are very similar, but when it comes to forming a political union, any cultural differences would be immediately exacerbated. You'd potentially have the Irish and Highland Scots on one side, with Lowland Scots and Northern Irish on the other, with everyone arguing about where the parliament building should be.
LoughNeagh2017 wrote: » Highland Scots are from a "Northern Irish" ancestry
US2 wrote: » This "we voted remain" is nonsense. Should gay marriage still be illegal in rosscomon ?
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » I say it every time Scottish independence is mentioned here on boards. Scottish independence would be economically bad for Ireland. In the EU, speaking English etc they could be a direct competitor to Ireland for the FDI we so much rely on. Other than Irish republicans like the op describes themselves as, who see this as a way to get back at the English by proxy, I don't see why anyone in Ireland should be in favour of the idea.
LuckyLloyd wrote: » We should be in favour of the idea because it’s their right to make their own way if they so choose, and it has been dreadful to watch their interests and desires regarding the EU trampled by English nationalism and the narrow concerns of the Conservative party.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » Should we be in support of every separatist movement in Europe, the world ?
derrymcorry wrote: » They have North Sea oil.
jm08 wrote: » How come they are not that competitive on FDI at the moment? Apart from anything else, Scotland's economy is different to Irelands in that it has oil, gas and heavy industry.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » Because a UK wide corporate tax rate of 19% makes them less attractive than Ireland's 12.5% I thought that much would be obvious. An independent Scotland could cut to 12.5% or lower if they saw fit.
derrymcorry wrote: » An independent Scotland and a united Ireland would be best friends within the EU. England can do whatever it wants. An independent Scotland and Ireland within the EU would lead both countries to thrive. Scotland is big enough, populous enough and rich enough to be independent. They have a higher national income per head of population than France, Japan and New Zealand. They have North Sea oil. They have scotch:D. They would do brilliantly as an independent state, just as Ireland would as a reunified state.
Jayferg wrote: » Food for thoughthttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/here-s-why-scotland-is-in-sights-of-putin-s-russia-andrew-foxall-and-james-rogers-1-4890453/amp
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » People who assume Scotland would be Ireland's friend if independent need only think back to the Rockall drama a few months ago. That was Edinburgh driving that, not Westminster.
bob mcbob wrote: » From these guys - The Henry Jackson Society is a libertarian British foreign policy think tank. It has been described as right-wing, but positions itself as cross-partisan, with support from some left-leaning politicians. A couple of points on the article - - London has started to take Russian interest in Scotland seriously and has adopted a "Fusion Doctrine" to counter hybrid warfare. So that is what Boris, JRM, et al are up to - sorry I did not realise - SNP wants to join NATO but opposes Trident - this is ironic as these submarines provide NATOs nuclear deterrence in Europe Which other NATO country has it's main nuclear arsenal 30 miles from it's main population centre?
A Dub in Glasgo wrote: » How many NATO members are nuclear armed?
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » Other than Irish republicans like the op describes themselves as, who see this as a way to get back at the English by proxy
The Golden Miller wrote: » You say this sort of stuff like you're any better. You hide behind being against Scottish independence because it's "bad for Ireland", yet the truth is alot more basic, you have a penchant for all things British/UK.