Jim2007 wrote: » You need to open you mind a bit. There is noting stopping Scotland from joining EFTA and accessing the single market via the EEA agreement, the same as Norway. In fact it would probably suit them much better than EU membership.
Jim2007 wrote: » There is no obligation on them to do so, they could just adapt Sterling if they wished. A Scottish central bank and government issuing bonds etc... in Sterling would cause headaches for the BOE, but's life.
A Dub in Glasgo wrote: » If Scotland becomes independent it will have to have its own currency (which they can peg to Sterling if they wish).
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » With the Catalan situation still unresolved Scotland may be a long way from EU membership so it could be a moot point.
derrymcorry wrote: » A Do you believe that it would be in the best interests of the Scottish people to become an indpendent country within the EU?
derrymcorry wrote: » I, as an Irish republican, would be delighted to see an indpendent Scotland as I believe they could be our best friend within the EU now with England gone.
derrymcorry wrote: » Also, think about the benefits that Scottish independence could have for Irish reunification.
rock22 wrote: » The SNP, while saying they want to join the EU after an independence vote are also saying they want to retain their own currency etc. They appear to believe they would have the same exceptions the UK won for itself.
Aegir wrote: » if the SNP want independence, they should get the English to vote on it.
US2 wrote: » This "we voted remain" is nonsense. Should gay marriage still be illegal in rosscomon ?
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » I don't hide behind it because it's bad for Ireland, I'm pretty open about saying it's bad for Ireland. And I lack a penchant for all things British/UK as equally as I lack a penchant for all things Scottish. I'm pretty ambivalent about Catalan independence, because I don't think it would have the same effect on Ireland as Scottish independence would. So I'm not hiding behind anything.
Jayferg wrote: » Food for thoughthttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/here-s-why-scotland-is-in-sights-of-putin-s-russia-andrew-foxall-and-james-rogers-1-4890453/amp
A Dub in Glasgo wrote: » Westminster decided Rockall was part of the UK and allocated it to Scotland with its own exclusion zone around it and fisheries is devolved to Scotland therefore Scotland is implementing Westminster law
Eric Cartman wrote: » considering how the EU feels about our rate, I would only imagine on the very slim chance of them getting back into the EU, that not dropping it below 19% would be the basis of any agreement to let them in to stop precisely that.
The Golden Miller wrote: » You say this sort of stuff like you're any better. You hide behind being against Scottish independence because it's "bad for Ireland", yet the truth is alot more basic, you have a penchant for all things British/UK.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » Other than Irish republicans like the op describes themselves as, who see this as a way to get back at the English by proxy
A Dub in Glasgo wrote: » How many NATO members are nuclear armed?
bob mcbob wrote: » From these guys - The Henry Jackson Society is a libertarian British foreign policy think tank. It has been described as right-wing, but positions itself as cross-partisan, with support from some left-leaning politicians. A couple of points on the article - - London has started to take Russian interest in Scotland seriously and has adopted a "Fusion Doctrine" to counter hybrid warfare. So that is what Boris, JRM, et al are up to - sorry I did not realise - SNP wants to join NATO but opposes Trident - this is ironic as these submarines provide NATOs nuclear deterrence in Europe Which other NATO country has it's main nuclear arsenal 30 miles from it's main population centre?
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » People who assume Scotland would be Ireland's friend if independent need only think back to the Rockall drama a few months ago. That was Edinburgh driving that, not Westminster.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » Because a UK wide corporate tax rate of 19% makes them less attractive than Ireland's 12.5% I thought that much would be obvious. An independent Scotland could cut to 12.5% or lower if they saw fit.
derrymcorry wrote: » An independent Scotland and a united Ireland would be best friends within the EU. England can do whatever it wants. An independent Scotland and Ireland within the EU would lead both countries to thrive. Scotland is big enough, populous enough and rich enough to be independent. They have a higher national income per head of population than France, Japan and New Zealand. They have North Sea oil. They have scotch:D. They would do brilliantly as an independent state, just as Ireland would as a reunified state.
jm08 wrote: » How come they are not that competitive on FDI at the moment? Apart from anything else, Scotland's economy is different to Irelands in that it has oil, gas and heavy industry.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » I say it every time Scottish independence is mentioned here on boards. Scottish independence would be economically bad for Ireland. In the EU, speaking English etc they could be a direct competitor to Ireland for the FDI we so much rely on. Other than Irish republicans like the op describes themselves as, who see this as a way to get back at the English by proxy, I don't see why anyone in Ireland should be in favour of the idea.
derrymcorry wrote: » They have North Sea oil.