nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Waggle your 'Joystick' - Post your 3Dmark Scores here

MarkAnthony

For the craic!

Which one will we use, is there a free one which can post results. It should be a link as I don't trust any of you lot! :pac:

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

z0oT

z0oT wrote: »

A Time Spy result I just got.

3700X & 5700 XT both @ stock.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/40128118?

Realized the memory had defaulted back to 2133MHz, had to reset it in the BIOS to get it back to 3200MHz.

Here's a more true result.
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/40128442?

wotzgoingon

Good scores z0ot. Why did you memory reset itself? Mine hasn't done that once since I got my system.

z0oT

It's likely BIOS related - the one I'm using is the F6a, it was the 1st ABBA bios that's since been removed from Gigabyte's website.

I'm kind of lazy to update it though, I'll probably just hang on until the next non-beta version is up on Gigabyte's website.

I was getting 70-100fps in Gears 5 with all the settings up to the max on 1440p all week so I never thought to check the memory.

Venom

Gears 5 has seriously good optimization for PC.

K.O.Kiki

Venom wrote: »

Gears 5 has seriously good optimization for PC.

I put it on locked 60fps gameplay / 30fps cutscenes.

THE HERESY! :pac:

Venom

K.O.Kiki wrote: »

I put it on locked 60fps gameplay / 30fps cutscenes.

THE HERESY! :pac:

wotzgoingon

wotzgoingon wrote: »

New Score with a 3700X clocked at 4.39GHz and Rx 5700 XT @ 2178MHz on core and 1840MHz on memory

Graphics score is 9988, hopefully some day I break the 10000, don't ask how I can do that with a reference design card.

Timespy score: 10177

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/8757520

Well above in bold. I manged to break 10000 graphics score.

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/8874373

mossym

just put the new build together, 2070 super, 3700x, 16gig of 3200 ram

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/40231747?

10056 on timespy, the cpu came in at 9159 , gpu at 10234. that's running at stock though so room to improve that, need to check what the ram is running at as well, this was literally 20 mins after first boot .

TitianGerm

mossym wrote: »

just put the new build together, 2070 super, 3700x, 16gig of 3200 ram

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/40231747?

10056 on timespy, the cpu came in at 9159 , gpu at 10234. that's running at stock though so room to improve that, need to check what the ram is running at as well, this was literally 20 mins after first boot .

RAM is 2128 looking at the bottom of your link.

mossym

TitianGerm wrote: »

RAM is 2128 looking at the bottom of your link.

i was looking in the local software itself for the memory speed and it didn't list it, forgot the web link gave it.

right, need to get my memory speed up!!

mossym

right, proper memory timing helped alright

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/40234172?

10138 now, with the cpu still at base.

TitianGerm

TitianGerm wrote: »

So I installed my new RTX 2060 and ran Time Spy again tonight and saw quite a jump compared to the 1060.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/33264222?

1060 = 4499
2060 = 7550

That is nearly a 68% increase in scores and way more than I expected.

I was bored this evening and said I'd play around with MSI Afterburner for a little bit. Anyway I upped Power Limit to 110, Temp Limit to 85, Core Clock to +115 and Memory Clock to +1013 and ran Time Spy again. New score of 8061 compared to my original run of 7550.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/41283861?

As I said that's my first time using Afterburner so not sure if the above are pushing it to far but I'd no crashes or anything so I'd guess it's ok?

Edit: max GPU temp was 68° and max CPU temp was 53°.

wotzgoingon

Well AMD fine wine strikes again. I was browsing a different site online and seen a high 5700 XT score so I decided to run a few benchmarks since I hadn't done for a few months.

Timespy score: 10652
Graphics score: 10528

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/9850681

TheDoc

Ran this for the first time

TimeSpy Score: 8337

Details here

wotzgoingon

I'm currently 11th in the world for graphics score in Timespy for the 5700 XT single card. Not bad.

https://www.3dmark.com/newsearch#advanced?test=spy%20P&cpuId=&gpuId=1285&gpuCount=1&deviceType=ALL&memoryChannels=0&country=&scoreType=graphicsScore&hofMode=false&showInvalidResults=false

That's with a reference model also. That top score could be LN2 as it's a bit high.

BloodBath

TheDoc wrote: »

Ran this for the first time

TimeSpy Score: 8337

Details here

You're scoring a little higher than me. 120 points or so.

I guess you have better airflow and are ramping up a bit higher than me on average since the card auto overclocks itself on the fly depending on temps.

What was you 1070 score?

TheDoc

BloodBath wrote: »

You're scoring a little higher than me. 120 points or so.

I guess you have better airflow and are ramping up a bit higher than me on average since the card auto overclocks itself on the fly depending on temps.

What was you 1070 score?

Never did a benchmark before to be honest, never been of interest

K.O.Kiki

Ryzen 5-3600X vs i7-5820K with RTX 2070 Super
(i7 was running at 4.37GHz)
https://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/9934610/spy/8444073

IT'S OVER TEN THOUSAAAAAAND!

K.O.Kiki

Fixed my RAM timings (now 3600 @ 16-19-19-39)
Score improved to 10'183

wotzgoingon

Well decided to run a bench mark this evening. Got the idea from another forum as I haven't ran one in quite some time. Got the score below first try. Pushed memory up higher for second and it crashed so called it a day. Not a bad graphics score for a first run. Best score yet but my CPU score is down from a previous run.

New score: https://www.3dmark.com/spy/12956318

Old score better CPU score: https://www.3dmark.com/spy/9850681

Metric Tensor

I had problems with CPU speed dropping between tests a year apart and I decided (without much evidence to be fair) that it was due to the updates related to Meltdown and Spectre. I had to push my overclock higher to get back to the same level.

Edit: That's what you get for posting without reading - I see you have a Ryzen processor so none of what I wrote is relevant!

wotzgoingon

I ran a benchmark this evening. Currently 15th in the world graphics score for a single 5700 XT. I was so close from 11,000 overall score.

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/14627448

MiskyBoyy

Testing my new 3080

Timespy 16256 - https://www.3dmark.com/spy/14879456

Port Royal 12727 - https://www.3dmark.com/pr/447693

wotzgoingon

Not bad scores Misky.

K.O.Kiki

Not 3DMark but I finally fixed my CPU overclock.

All-core 4175MHz @ 1.3V with -100mV offset.

TitianGerm

TitianGerm wrote: »

I was bored this evening and said I'd play around with MSI Afterburner for a little bit. Anyway I upped Power Limit to 110, Temp Limit to 85, Core Clock to +115 and Memory Clock to +1013 and ran Time Spy again. New score of 8061 compared to my original run of 7550.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/41283861?

As I said that's my first time using Afterburner so not sure if the above are pushing it to far but I'd no crashes or anything so I'd guess it's ok?

Edit: max GPU temp was 68° and max CPU temp was 53°.

New build and first run on Time Spy and a score of 12,009 with everything running at default.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/53033123?

twinsen

MiskyBoyy wrote: »

Testing my new 3080

Timespy 16256 - https://www.3dmark.com/spy/14879456

Port Royal 12727 - https://www.3dmark.com/pr/447693

I managed only 12079 in port royal https://www.3dmark.com/pr/516154
are you on water or something? Impressive score
In timespy I am getting 15869 https://www.3dmark.com/spy/15407229

Revoker88

twinsen wrote: »

I managed only 12079 in port royal https://www.3dmark.com/pr/516154
are you on water or something? Impressive score
In timespy I am getting 15869 https://www.3dmark.com/spy/15407229

Yeah his temps are pretty good,the average clock is nice too. Keeping them cool is the key

Out of interest,were you setting any sort of custom fan profile for benching?

twinsen

EoinHef wrote: »

Yeah his temps are pretty good,the average clock is nice too. Keeping them cool is the key

Out of interest,were you setting any sort of custom fan profile for benching?

Not yet. Only got this thing delivered today. I hope I will have some time over the weekend to mess around with it.

Revoker88

twinsen wrote: »

Not yet. Only got this thing delivered today. I hope I will have some time over the weekend to mess around with it.

Should help with temps a bit if ye can find the sweet spot.

Either misky is on water or he has the fans cranked to get those temps id imagine. If not I want one of whatever card he bought.

57C at 2100+ on the core,very nice indeed